Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 0 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Dutch Journalists Rights Group File Lawsuit Challenging EU Ban On... |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Dutch Journalists Rights Group File Lawsuit Challenging EU Ban On... |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>By Toby Sterling<br> <br>AMSTERDAM, May 25 (Reuters) - The [https://pixabay.com/images/search/main%20Dutch/ main Dutch] journalists' union on Wednesday filed a [https://www.gov.uk/search/all?keywords=lawsuit%20challenging lawsuit challenging] the European Union's ban on Russian state-backed media outlets as a violation of European citizens' own rights to freedom of information.<br> <br>The EU issued sweeping restrictions on the [https://pixabay.com/images/search/distribution/ distribution] of Russia Today and Sputnik in Europe on March 2 as part of sanctions against Moscow, arguing that they produced propaganda used to justify and [http://www.techandtrends.com/?s=support support] the invasion of Ukraine.<br> <br>The Dutch lawsuit, filed at the EU's Court of Justice, did not endorse the content produced by the Russian organizations or say that European broadcasters should carry them.<br> <br>Rather, it said the ban was overly broad and that allowing politicians to enact censorship policies overnight is wrong in principle.<br> <br>"If you're talking about sanctions, then the idea is to punish Russia," said Thomas Bruning of the Nederlandse Vereniging van Journalisten (NVJ).<br> <br>"But in fact you're punishing the European people, by not treating them like adults and not giving them the possibility to access information."<br> <br>He said that allowing the ban to go unchallenged could set a precedent for banning other politicized [https://www.rtnewstoday.com/ RT News Today] outlets. |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-
+<br>By Toby Sterling<br> <br>AMSTERDAM, May 25 (Reuters) - The [https://pixabay.com/images/search/main%20Dutch/ main Dutch] journalists' union on Wednesday filed a [https://www.gov.uk/search/all?keywords=lawsuit%20challenging lawsuit challenging] the European Union's ban on Russian state-backed media outlets as a violation of European citizens' own rights to freedom of information.<br> <br>The EU issued sweeping restrictions on the [https://pixabay.com/images/search/distribution/ distribution] of Russia Today and Sputnik in Europe on March 2 as part of sanctions against Moscow, arguing that they produced propaganda used to justify and [http://www.techandtrends.com/?s=support support] the invasion of Ukraine.<br> <br>The Dutch lawsuit, filed at the EU's Court of Justice, did not endorse the content produced by the Russian organizations or say that European broadcasters should carry them.<br> <br>Rather, it said the ban was overly broad and that allowing politicians to enact censorship policies overnight is wrong in principle.<br> <br>"If you're talking about sanctions, then the idea is to punish Russia," said Thomas Bruning of the Nederlandse Vereniging van Journalisten (NVJ).<br> <br>"But in fact you're punishing the European people, by not treating them like adults and not giving them the possibility to access information."<br> <br>He said that allowing the ban to go unchallenged could set a precedent for banning other politicized [https://www.rtnewstoday.com/ RT News Today] outlets.
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>By Toby Sterling<br> <br>AMSTERDAM, May 25 (Reuters) - The [https://pixabay.com/images/search/main%20Dutch/ main Dutch] journalists' union on Wednesday filed a [https://www.gov.uk/search/all?keywords=lawsuit%20challenging lawsuit challenging] the European Union's ban on Russian state-backed media outlets as a violation of European citizens' own rights to freedom of information.<br> <br>The EU issued sweeping restrictions on the [https://pixabay.com/images/search/distribution/ distribution] of Russia Today and Sputnik in Europe on March 2 as part of sanctions against Moscow, arguing that they produced propaganda used to justify and [http://www.techandtrends.com/?s=support support] the invasion of Ukraine.<br> <br>The Dutch lawsuit, filed at the EU's Court of Justice, did not endorse the content produced by the Russian organizations or say that European broadcasters should carry them.<br> <br>Rather, it said the ban was overly broad and that allowing politicians to enact censorship policies overnight is wrong in principle.<br> <br>"If you're talking about sanctions, then the idea is to punish Russia," said Thomas Bruning of the Nederlandse Vereniging van Journalisten (NVJ).<br> <br>"But in fact you're punishing the European people, by not treating them like adults and not giving them the possibility to access information."<br> <br>He said that allowing the ban to go unchallenged could set a precedent for banning other politicized [https://www.rtnewstoday.com/ RT News Today] outlets.
|
