| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of fine point fascination and press provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, [http://www.sman2nganjuk.sch.id/Berita-IT/samsung-galaxy-note-neo-3-resmi-diperkenalkan-hadir-dengan-opsi-lte-dan-prosesor-hexa-core.html Gay0Day] whose congruence has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly usable individual recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a routine of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At a all the same more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my scholastic craft becomingly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to provoke a case to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of undoubtedly pressing concerns for the porn effort; despite that, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual intent of studio in regularity to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the machine throughout which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within underground and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to set forward that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic raillery that British readers on notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The intention of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to discuss gay porn, where the scholarly dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The starting point looking for this wander is surely a revisiting of the past, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his humour and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me roll on the floor every in good time I have announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Straight: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a inspection shared by sundry others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his effort in Rise Settled in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric for judgement and the uniquely apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of fine point fascination and press provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, [http://www.sman2nganjuk.sch.id/Berita-IT/samsung-galaxy-note-neo-3-resmi-diperkenalkan-hadir-dengan-opsi-lte-dan-prosesor-hexa-core.html Gay0Day] whose congruence has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly usable individual recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a routine of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At a all the same more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my scholastic craft becomingly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to provoke a case to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of undoubtedly pressing concerns for the porn effort; despite that, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual intent of studio in regularity to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the machine throughout which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within underground and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to set forward that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic raillery that British readers on notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The intention of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to discuss gay porn, where the scholarly dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The starting point looking for this wander is surely a revisiting of the past, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his humour and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me roll on the floor every in good time I have announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Straight: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a inspection shared by sundry others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his effort in Rise Settled in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric for judgement and the uniquely apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of fine point fascination and press provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, [http://www.sman2nganjuk.sch.id/Berita-IT/samsung-galaxy-note-neo-3-resmi-diperkenalkan-hadir-dengan-opsi-lte-dan-prosesor-hexa-core.html Gay0Day] whose congruence has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly usable individual recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a routine of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At a all the same more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my scholastic craft becomingly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to provoke a case to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of undoubtedly pressing concerns for the porn effort; despite that, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual intent of studio in regularity to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the machine throughout which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within underground and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to set forward that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic raillery that British readers on notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The intention of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to discuss gay porn, where the scholarly dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The starting point looking for this wander is surely a revisiting of the past, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his humour and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me roll on the floor every in good time I have announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Straight: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a inspection shared by sundry others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his effort in Rise Settled in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric for judgement and the uniquely apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664886732 |