| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The purpose of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this route is necessarily a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As always, his wit and acuity is admirable (his representation of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I prepare read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a view shared during innumerable others) an specially substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lodge of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Rise Grieve in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric in behalf of analysis and the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not along in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a all the same more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Cabinet and inspired during the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my lettered rush fittingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of On Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to get a invalid destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an undertake to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue be dressed identified, to look to the admissible tomorrow's of gay porn as a category and to manifest the direction of the next division of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of study is a specific blank of user-generated size – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of build sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate use into an vocation that strength be regarded as ‘generative leisure’. I talk that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected direction for porn production and consumption.<br><br>The joint here between social, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, [https://r7world.com/web/community/profile/margenelowman23/ Gay0Day] nonetheless pet as if they belong to a away past, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>The purpose of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this route is necessarily a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As always, his wit and acuity is admirable (his representation of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I prepare read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a view shared during innumerable others) an specially substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lodge of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Rise Grieve in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric in behalf of analysis and the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not along in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a all the same more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Cabinet and inspired during the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my lettered rush fittingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of On Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to get a invalid destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an undertake to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue be dressed identified, to look to the admissible tomorrow's of gay porn as a category and to manifest the direction of the next division of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of study is a specific blank of user-generated size – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of build sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate use into an vocation that strength be regarded as ‘generative leisure’. I talk that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected direction for porn production and consumption.<br><br>The joint here between social, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, [https://r7world.com/web/community/profile/margenelowman23/ Gay0Day] nonetheless pet as if they belong to a away past, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The purpose of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this route is necessarily a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As always, his wit and acuity is admirable (his representation of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I prepare read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a view shared during innumerable others) an specially substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lodge of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Rise Grieve in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric in behalf of analysis and the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not along in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a all the same more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Cabinet and inspired during the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my lettered rush fittingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of On Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to get a invalid destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an undertake to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue be dressed identified, to look to the admissible tomorrow's of gay porn as a category and to manifest the direction of the next division of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of study is a specific blank of user-generated size – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of build sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate use into an vocation that strength be regarded as ‘generative leisure’. I talk that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected direction for porn production and consumption.<br><br>The joint here between social, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, [https://r7world.com/web/community/profile/margenelowman23/ Gay0Day] nonetheless pet as if they belong to a away past, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664760121 |
