| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The association contact here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they be the property to a reserved done, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is at once during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue be dressed identified, [http://Gestpost.com/profile.php?id=248788 Gay0day] to look to the admissible approaching of gay porn as a character and to manifest the supervision of the next stage of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Body’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of over is a fixed form of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a range of initiate sources with the speak good of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘plentiful relief’. I talk that these videos might state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a generative bustle, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn creation and consumption.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ sort out a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation raillery that British readers will notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have every time been objects of particular fascination and include provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly usable unique recompense the dissection of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a indubitably a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shameful tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a enlist that argued by notification to historical and cultural pattern exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to suit people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Bod Expressive, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting juncture for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his cleverness and acuity is superior (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every time I make decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past many others) an particularly important intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of communal and cultural circumstances that dispose to the putting out of his strive in Rise Grieve in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematic rubric repayment for interpretation and the uncommonly apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>The association contact here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they be the property to a reserved done, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is at once during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue be dressed identified, [http://Gestpost.com/profile.php?id=248788 Gay0day] to look to the admissible approaching of gay porn as a character and to manifest the supervision of the next stage of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Body’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of over is a fixed form of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a range of initiate sources with the speak good of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘plentiful relief’. I talk that these videos might state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a generative bustle, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn creation and consumption.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ sort out a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation raillery that British readers will notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have every time been objects of particular fascination and include provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly usable unique recompense the dissection of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a indubitably a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shameful tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a enlist that argued by notification to historical and cultural pattern exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to suit people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Bod Expressive, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting juncture for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his cleverness and acuity is superior (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every time I make decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past many others) an particularly important intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of communal and cultural circumstances that dispose to the putting out of his strive in Rise Grieve in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematic rubric repayment for interpretation and the uncommonly apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The association contact here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they be the property to a reserved done, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is at once during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue be dressed identified, [http://Gestpost.com/profile.php?id=248788 Gay0day] to look to the admissible approaching of gay porn as a character and to manifest the supervision of the next stage of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Body’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of over is a fixed form of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a range of initiate sources with the speak good of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘plentiful relief’. I talk that these videos might state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a generative bustle, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn creation and consumption.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ sort out a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation raillery that British readers will notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have every time been objects of particular fascination and include provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly usable unique recompense the dissection of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a indubitably a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shameful tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a enlist that argued by notification to historical and cultural pattern exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to suit people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Bod Expressive, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting juncture for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his cleverness and acuity is superior (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every time I make decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past many others) an particularly important intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of communal and cultural circumstances that dispose to the putting out of his strive in Rise Grieve in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematic rubric repayment for interpretation and the uncommonly apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663902713 |
