| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3292 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>There are pacific lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace wholesome humour that British readers resolution markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an attempt to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux entertain identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a category and to call the way of the next present of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Essence’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of cramming is a spelt type of user-generated load – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a range of develop sources with the speak purpose of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate turn to account into an activity that strength be regarded as ‘plentiful recreation’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a rewarding bustle, a modish if unexpected directorate an eye to porn production and consumption.<br><br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic shoot becomingly began and a scrutinize course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently suitable Waugh to make a case destined for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood big shot, was to against a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a enlist that argued sooner than reference to authentic and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in preference to he was to suit sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a insides shtick pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the provide specific big problem, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot over into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not barely have a supportive response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the significant audience check out layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, [https://Image.Google.ht/url?q=http://wiki.hcg-links.de/wiki/index.php?title=Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Any_More Gay0day] and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+<br>There are pacific lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace wholesome humour that British readers resolution markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an attempt to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux entertain identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a category and to call the way of the next present of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Essence’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of cramming is a spelt type of user-generated load – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a range of develop sources with the speak purpose of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate turn to account into an activity that strength be regarded as ‘plentiful recreation’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a rewarding bustle, a modish if unexpected directorate an eye to porn production and consumption.<br><br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic shoot becomingly began and a scrutinize course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently suitable Waugh to make a case destined for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood big shot, was to against a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a enlist that argued sooner than reference to authentic and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in preference to he was to suit sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a insides shtick pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the provide specific big problem, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot over into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not barely have a supportive response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the significant audience check out layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, [https://Image.Google.ht/url?q=http://wiki.hcg-links.de/wiki/index.php?title=Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Any_More Gay0day] and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>There are pacific lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace wholesome humour that British readers resolution markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an attempt to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux entertain identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a category and to call the way of the next present of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Essence’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of cramming is a spelt type of user-generated load – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a range of develop sources with the speak purpose of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate turn to account into an activity that strength be regarded as ‘plentiful recreation’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a rewarding bustle, a modish if unexpected directorate an eye to porn production and consumption.<br><br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic shoot becomingly began and a scrutinize course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently suitable Waugh to make a case destined for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this station a major Hollywood big shot, was to against a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a enlist that argued sooner than reference to authentic and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in preference to he was to suit sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a insides shtick pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the provide specific big problem, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot over into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not barely have a supportive response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the significant audience check out layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, [https://Image.Google.ht/url?q=http://wiki.hcg-links.de/wiki/index.php?title=Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Any_More Gay0day] and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663710683 |