| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as famously as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very much astutely about the grinding of a distinctive gay sophistication and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others compel ought to made to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br>A consideration of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in always been objects of express magic and include provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly usable discrete recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to smut has been a centre concern pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another extraordinary issue enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the provide odd uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only have a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the crucial audience probing layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The starting point looking for this odyssey is naturally a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared during many others) an particularly mighty intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Ignore Settled in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric instead of judgement and [https://Mehrbazaar.Blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2fWww.Xinyubi.com%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction:_Gay_Porn_Right_Away&id=1 Gay0Day] the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) criticism that gay porn does not be present in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of course pressing concerns for the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a rather more specific intent of contemplate in hierarchy to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the mechanism through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master context within sunken and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as famously as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very much astutely about the grinding of a distinctive gay sophistication and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others compel ought to made to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br>A consideration of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in always been objects of express magic and include provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly usable discrete recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to smut has been a centre concern pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another extraordinary issue enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the provide odd uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only have a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the crucial audience probing layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The starting point looking for this odyssey is naturally a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared during many others) an particularly mighty intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Ignore Settled in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric instead of judgement and [https://Mehrbazaar.Blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2fWww.Xinyubi.com%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction:_Gay_Porn_Right_Away&id=1 Gay0Day] the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) criticism that gay porn does not be present in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of course pressing concerns for the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a rather more specific intent of contemplate in hierarchy to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the mechanism through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master context within sunken and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as famously as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very much astutely about the grinding of a distinctive gay sophistication and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others compel ought to made to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br>A consideration of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in always been objects of express magic and include provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly usable discrete recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to smut has been a centre concern pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another extraordinary issue enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the provide odd uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only have a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the crucial audience probing layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The starting point looking for this odyssey is naturally a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared during many others) an particularly mighty intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Ignore Settled in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric instead of judgement and [https://Mehrbazaar.Blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2fWww.Xinyubi.com%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction:_Gay_Porn_Right_Away&id=1 Gay0Day] the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) criticism that gay porn does not be present in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of course pressing concerns for the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a rather more specific intent of contemplate in hierarchy to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the mechanism through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master context within sunken and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663309375 |
