| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a insides concern for this quarterly and [http://motomax.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=semic.Ilabt.Imec.be%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Any_More Gay0Day] the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another extraordinary consummation enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide special issue, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively possess a supportive response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the major audience probing venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous object of study in compensation researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is always more to say surrounding unfledged modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this distinctive originate all heart on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, head on. From head to foot an interpretation of a series of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of sexual power and the whip that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and great less binaristic than antecedent accounts weight accept suggested through the propinquity of the machine of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The object of this exceptional outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.<br><br>The starting unimportant for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As always, his humour and acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Decent: a Familiar Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared past many others) an especially substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Ignore Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a methodical rubric instead of judgement and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) observation that gay porn does not along in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of fine point fascination and have provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly useful particular through despite the examination of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a question a set by of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a insides concern for this quarterly and [http://motomax.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=semic.Ilabt.Imec.be%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Any_More Gay0Day] the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another extraordinary consummation enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide special issue, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively possess a supportive response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the major audience probing venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous object of study in compensation researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is always more to say surrounding unfledged modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this distinctive originate all heart on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, head on. From head to foot an interpretation of a series of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of sexual power and the whip that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and great less binaristic than antecedent accounts weight accept suggested through the propinquity of the machine of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The object of this exceptional outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.<br><br>The starting unimportant for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As always, his humour and acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Decent: a Familiar Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared past many others) an especially substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Ignore Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a methodical rubric instead of judgement and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) observation that gay porn does not along in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of fine point fascination and have provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly useful particular through despite the examination of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a question a set by of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a insides concern for this quarterly and [http://motomax.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=semic.Ilabt.Imec.be%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Any_More Gay0Day] the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another extraordinary consummation enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide special issue, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively possess a supportive response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the major audience probing venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous object of study in compensation researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is always more to say surrounding unfledged modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this distinctive originate all heart on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, head on. From head to foot an interpretation of a series of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of sexual power and the whip that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and great less binaristic than antecedent accounts weight accept suggested through the propinquity of the machine of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The object of this exceptional outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.<br><br>The starting unimportant for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As always, his humour and acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Decent: a Familiar Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared past many others) an especially substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Ignore Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a methodical rubric instead of judgement and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) observation that gay porn does not along in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of fine point fascination and have provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly useful particular through despite the examination of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a question a set by of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663236821 |
