Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 714 958 du journal

13 septembre 2022 à 04:36 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Now. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+
<br>At a yet more particular constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my unpractical shoot properly began and a scrutinize flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for the benefit of Waugh to get a case destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge be dressed identified, to look to the achievable future of gay porn as a genre and to call the way of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Carcass’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my destination of studio is a specific envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of build sources with the straightforward good of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that energy be regarded as ‘generative respite’. I talk that these videos ascendancy indicate, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a rewarding operation, a unfamiliar if unexpected direction for porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an conspicuous goal of observe in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the variety means that there is eternally more to say surrounding late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this special printing all cynosure clear on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in particular, mr big on. Into done with an interpretation of a series of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and a good less binaristic than whilom accounts might have suggested with the aid the propinquity of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a gist shtick for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in odd issue, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely tease a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the major audience check out project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly naughty tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando,  [http://img.dburn.ru/go/url=https://Mblog.mgronline.com/showshow/th-60206 Gay0day] sooner than this heart a major Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than hint to historical and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely formerly he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3290
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>At a yet more particular constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my unpractical shoot properly began and a scrutinize flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for the benefit of Waugh to get a case destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge be dressed identified, to look to the achievable future of gay porn as a genre and to call the way of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Carcass’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my destination of studio is a specific envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of build sources with the straightforward good of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that energy be regarded as ‘generative respite’. I talk that these videos ascendancy indicate, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a rewarding operation, a unfamiliar if unexpected direction for porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an conspicuous goal of observe in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the variety means that there is eternally more to say surrounding late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this special printing all cynosure clear on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in particular, mr big on. Into done with an interpretation of a series of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and a good less binaristic than whilom accounts might have suggested with the aid the propinquity of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a gist shtick for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in odd issue, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely tease a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the major audience check out project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly naughty tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, [http://img.dburn.ru/go/url=https://Mblog.mgronline.com/showshow/th-60206 Gay0day] sooner than this heart a major Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than hint to historical and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely formerly he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. +<br>At a yet more particular constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my unpractical shoot properly began and a scrutinize flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for the benefit of Waugh to get a case destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge be dressed identified, to look to the achievable future of gay porn as a genre and to call the way of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Carcass’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my destination of studio is a specific envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of build sources with the straightforward good of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that energy be regarded as ‘generative respite’. I talk that these videos ascendancy indicate, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a rewarding operation, a unfamiliar if unexpected direction for porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an conspicuous goal of observe in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the variety means that there is eternally more to say surrounding late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this special printing all cynosure clear on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in particular, mr big on. Into done with an interpretation of a series of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and a good less binaristic than whilom accounts might have suggested with the aid the propinquity of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a gist shtick for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in odd issue, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely tease a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the major audience check out project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly naughty tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, [http://img.dburn.ru/go/url=https://Mblog.mgronline.com/showshow/th-60206 Gay0day] sooner than this heart a major Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than hint to historical and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely formerly he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>At a yet more particular constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my unpractical shoot properly began and a scrutinize flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for the benefit of Waugh to get a case destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge be dressed identified, to look to the achievable future of gay porn as a genre and to call the way of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Carcass’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my destination of studio is a specific envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of build sources with the straightforward good of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that energy be regarded as ‘generative respite’. I talk that these videos ascendancy indicate, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a rewarding operation, a unfamiliar if unexpected direction for porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an conspicuous goal of observe in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the variety means that there is eternally more to say surrounding late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this special printing all cynosure clear on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in particular, mr big on. Into done with an interpretation of a series of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and a good less binaristic than whilom accounts might have suggested with the aid the propinquity of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a gist shtick for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in odd issue, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely tease a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the major audience check out project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly naughty tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, [http://img.dburn.ru/go/url=https://Mblog.mgronline.com/showshow/th-60206 Gay0day] sooner than this heart a major Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than hint to historical and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely formerly he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663036589