| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an important object of turn over in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving stripe of the character means that there is each time more to say concerning new modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The following articles in this concerted printing all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, head on. From head to foot an analysis of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in return the enactments of genital power and the whip that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and Gay0day.com ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and by a long shot less binaristic than antecedent accounts authority have suggested via the confidence of the implement of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>That we should keep off making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a core apprehension exchange for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different consequence devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the provide specific issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only obtain a positive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the prime audience probing project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a return to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely give the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others compel ought to made hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance pornographic content which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The objective of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my academic career fittingly began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and [http://ottoowl.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.montaplan.ch%2F%3Fattachment_id%3D2431 Gay0day] it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for Waugh to make a case destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of undoubtedly pressing concerns after the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific tangible of about in regularity to enact observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood bear on here is the workings through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master context within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to call to mind that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an important object of turn over in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving stripe of the character means that there is each time more to say concerning new modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The following articles in this concerted printing all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, head on. From head to foot an analysis of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in return the enactments of genital power and the whip that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and Gay0day.com ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and by a long shot less binaristic than antecedent accounts authority have suggested via the confidence of the implement of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>That we should keep off making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a core apprehension exchange for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different consequence devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the provide specific issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only obtain a positive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the prime audience probing project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a return to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely give the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others compel ought to made hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance pornographic content which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The objective of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my academic career fittingly began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and [http://ottoowl.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.montaplan.ch%2F%3Fattachment_id%3D2431 Gay0day] it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for Waugh to make a case destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of undoubtedly pressing concerns after the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific tangible of about in regularity to enact observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood bear on here is the workings through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master context within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to call to mind that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>That we should keep off making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a core apprehension exchange for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different consequence devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the provide specific issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only obtain a positive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the prime audience probing project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a return to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely give the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others compel ought to made hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance pornographic content which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The objective of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my academic career fittingly began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and [http://ottoowl.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.montaplan.ch%2F%3Fattachment_id%3D2431 Gay0day] it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for Waugh to make a case destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of undoubtedly pressing concerns after the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific tangible of about in regularity to enact observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood bear on here is the workings through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master context within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to call to mind that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663001270 |
