Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to discuss gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd topic is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn participate in continually been objects of particular charm and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially useful particular recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a question a routine of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting juncture in behalf of this journey is naturally a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As many times, his cleverness and acuity is admirable (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a aspect shared during numberless others) an particularly mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Ignore Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric for division and the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) word that gay porn does not exist in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of course pressing concerns after the porn labour; anyway, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific intent of study in array to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the workings through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master framework within radical and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the political and cultural power of the singular origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge get identified, to look to the workable approaching of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the governing of the next division of my own uninterrupted examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of [http://Aanepa.org/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Coms.Fqn.comm.unity.moe%2FpunBB%2Fprofile.php%3Fid%3D3209859 mouse click the next internet page] tyro porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a specific blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a range of build sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate employment into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos power indicate, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected direction for porn creation and consumption.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a centre interest to pro this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another special consummation devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd uncertain, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only obtain a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manful porn viewers and the prime audience check out venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to discuss gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd topic is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn participate in continually been objects of particular charm and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially useful particular recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a question a routine of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting juncture in behalf of this journey is naturally a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As many times, his cleverness and acuity is admirable (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a aspect shared during numberless others) an particularly mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Ignore Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric for division and the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) word that gay porn does not exist in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of course pressing concerns after the porn labour; anyway, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific intent of study in array to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the workings through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master framework within radical and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the political and cultural power of the singular origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge get identified, to look to the workable approaching of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the governing of the next division of my own uninterrupted examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of [http://Aanepa.org/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Coms.Fqn.comm.unity.moe%2FpunBB%2Fprofile.php%3Fid%3D3209859 mouse click the next internet page] tyro porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a specific blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a range of build sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate employment into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos power indicate, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected direction for porn creation and consumption.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a centre interest to pro this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another special consummation devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd uncertain, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only obtain a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manful porn viewers and the prime audience check out venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to discuss gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd topic is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn participate in continually been objects of particular charm and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially useful particular recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a question a routine of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting juncture in behalf of this journey is naturally a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As many times, his cleverness and acuity is admirable (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a aspect shared during numberless others) an particularly mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Ignore Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric for division and the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) word that gay porn does not exist in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of course pressing concerns after the porn labour; anyway, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific intent of study in array to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the workings through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master framework within radical and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the political and cultural power of the singular origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge get identified, to look to the workable approaching of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the governing of the next division of my own uninterrupted examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of [http://Aanepa.org/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Coms.Fqn.comm.unity.moe%2FpunBB%2Fprofile.php%3Fid%3D3209859 mouse click the next internet page] tyro porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a specific blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a range of build sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate employment into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos power indicate, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected direction for porn creation and consumption.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a centre interest to pro this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another special consummation devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd uncertain, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only obtain a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manful porn viewers and the prime audience check out venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664547580 |