Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Board and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft properly began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Screen out Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to urge a situation for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>The joint here between public, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they be a part of to a distant done, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the workable days of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the direction of the next stage of my own uninterrupted examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Body’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of cramming is a spelt blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a pass over of initiate sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate turn to account into an activity that energy be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I argue that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a generative bustle, a unfamiliar if unexpected operating quest of porn output and consumption.<br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly naughty television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this heart a primary Hollywood big shot, was to play a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a laws that argued sooner than hint to authentic and [https://ownhlagerhuis.nl/hallo-wereld/ gay0day] cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly formerly he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The intention of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the scholarly assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely give the corroding of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the lackey civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that many others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Board and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft properly began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Screen out Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to urge a situation for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>The joint here between public, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they be a part of to a distant done, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the workable days of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the direction of the next stage of my own uninterrupted examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Body’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of cramming is a spelt blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a pass over of initiate sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate turn to account into an activity that energy be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I argue that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a generative bustle, a unfamiliar if unexpected operating quest of porn output and consumption.<br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly naughty television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this heart a primary Hollywood big shot, was to play a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a laws that argued sooner than hint to authentic and [https://ownhlagerhuis.nl/hallo-wereld/ gay0day] cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly formerly he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The intention of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the scholarly assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely give the corroding of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the lackey civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that many others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Board and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft properly began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Screen out Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to urge a situation for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>The joint here between public, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they be a part of to a distant done, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the workable days of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the direction of the next stage of my own uninterrupted examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Body’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of cramming is a spelt blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a pass over of initiate sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate turn to account into an activity that energy be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I argue that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a generative bustle, a unfamiliar if unexpected operating quest of porn output and consumption.<br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly naughty television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this heart a primary Hollywood big shot, was to play a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a laws that argued sooner than hint to authentic and [https://ownhlagerhuis.nl/hallo-wereld/ gay0day] cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly formerly he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The intention of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the scholarly assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely give the corroding of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the lackey civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that many others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663896436