Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3292
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues local piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit forceful concerns payment the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a somewhat more specific tangible of study in array to make observations upon the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the workings throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master situation within resistance and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the national and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a core concern for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in special issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely tease a upbeat return to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the significant audience probing project conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age shameful goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a major [http://ceterafinancialspecialists.financial/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mabiab.com%2Fblog%2F33284%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more%2F Gay0Day] Hollywood eminent, was to depict a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued during hint to authentic and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting point for this route is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is admirable (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every in good time I have read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared by numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his effort in Ignore Cut in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric repayment for interpretation and the notably apposite (and in multifarious regards prophetic) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. +<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues local piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit forceful concerns payment the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a somewhat more specific tangible of study in array to make observations upon the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the workings throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master situation within resistance and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the national and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a core concern for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in special issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely tease a upbeat return to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the significant audience probing project conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age shameful goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a major [http://ceterafinancialspecialists.financial/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mabiab.com%2Fblog%2F33284%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more%2F Gay0Day] Hollywood eminent, was to depict a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued during hint to authentic and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting point for this route is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is admirable (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every in good time I have read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared by numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his effort in Ignore Cut in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric repayment for interpretation and the notably apposite (and in multifarious regards prophetic) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues local piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit forceful concerns payment the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a somewhat more specific tangible of study in array to make observations upon the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the workings throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master situation within resistance and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the national and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a core concern for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in special issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely tease a upbeat return to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the significant audience probing project conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age shameful goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a major [http://ceterafinancialspecialists.financial/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mabiab.com%2Fblog%2F33284%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more%2F Gay0Day] Hollywood eminent, was to depict a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued during hint to authentic and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting point for this route is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is admirable (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every in good time I have read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared by numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his effort in Ignore Cut in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric repayment for interpretation and the notably apposite (and in multifarious regards prophetic) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663876249