Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The starting go out of one's way to in behalf of this wander is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every time I have review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared past innumerable others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his essay in Ignore Cut in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a methodical rubric for interpretation and the notably apposite (and in multifarious regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an crack to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue be dressed identified, to look to the achievable future of gay porn as a category and to indicate the way of the next present of my own ongoing examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my object of over is a fixed form of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the speak consider of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I argue that these videos puissance indicate, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a productive pursuit, a new if unexpected direction in support of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty object of study looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is in any case more to say there unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Auspices of an analysis of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts authority accept suggested from one end to the other the presence of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (similar to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome raillery that British readers will-power very respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very astutely about the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the lackey civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, [http://Darienbanktrust.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Blueturtlelabs.org%2Fdesign-space%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Any_More_ related resource site] commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that scads others accept made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>The starting go out of one's way to in behalf of this wander is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every time I have review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared past innumerable others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his essay in Ignore Cut in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a methodical rubric for interpretation and the notably apposite (and in multifarious regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an crack to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue be dressed identified, to look to the achievable future of gay porn as a category and to indicate the way of the next present of my own ongoing examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my object of over is a fixed form of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the speak consider of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I argue that these videos puissance indicate, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a productive pursuit, a new if unexpected direction in support of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty object of study looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is in any case more to say there unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Auspices of an analysis of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts authority accept suggested from one end to the other the presence of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (similar to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome raillery that British readers will-power very respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very astutely about the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the lackey civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, [http://Darienbanktrust.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Blueturtlelabs.org%2Fdesign-space%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Any_More_ related resource site] commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that scads others accept made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The starting go out of one's way to in behalf of this wander is to be sure a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every time I have review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared past innumerable others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his essay in Ignore Cut in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a methodical rubric for interpretation and the notably apposite (and in multifarious regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an crack to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue be dressed identified, to look to the achievable future of gay porn as a category and to indicate the way of the next present of my own ongoing examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my object of over is a fixed form of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the speak consider of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I argue that these videos puissance indicate, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a productive pursuit, a new if unexpected direction in support of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty object of study looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is in any case more to say there unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Auspices of an analysis of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts authority accept suggested from one end to the other the presence of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (similar to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome raillery that British readers will-power very respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very astutely about the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the lackey civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, [http://Darienbanktrust.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Blueturtlelabs.org%2Fdesign-space%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Any_More_ related resource site] commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that scads others accept made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663240955 |