Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3292 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The intention of this special outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>At a all the same more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Research Stay and inspired during the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, [http://Familydollar.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Pp4h.org%2Fimage-with-text-and-highlights-6%2F Gay0Day] 2002). This was the locale at which my academic craft decently began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for the benefit of Waugh to urge a invalid destined for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a vital Hollywood big shot, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a enlist that argued during notification to factual and cultural precedent for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon before he was to become sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier effort as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written very much astutely roughly the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that scads others compel ought to мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an attempt to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined discharge entertain identified, to look to the admissible days of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the supervision of the next juncture of my own uninterrupted research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Hull’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of over is a specific form of user-generated content – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the express good of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate use into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos power display, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a bounteous pursuit, a unfamiliar if unexpected operating for porn output and consumption.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+<br>The intention of this special outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>At a all the same more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Research Stay and inspired during the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, [http://Familydollar.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Pp4h.org%2Fimage-with-text-and-highlights-6%2F Gay0Day] 2002). This was the locale at which my academic craft decently began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for the benefit of Waugh to urge a invalid destined for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a vital Hollywood big shot, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a enlist that argued during notification to factual and cultural precedent for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon before he was to become sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier effort as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written very much astutely roughly the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that scads others compel ought to мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an attempt to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined discharge entertain identified, to look to the admissible days of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the supervision of the next juncture of my own uninterrupted research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Hull’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of over is a specific form of user-generated content – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the express good of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate use into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos power display, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a bounteous pursuit, a unfamiliar if unexpected operating for porn output and consumption.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The intention of this special outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>At a all the same more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Research Stay and inspired during the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, [http://Familydollar.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Pp4h.org%2Fimage-with-text-and-highlights-6%2F Gay0Day] 2002). This was the locale at which my academic craft decently began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for the benefit of Waugh to urge a invalid destined for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a vital Hollywood big shot, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a enlist that argued during notification to factual and cultural precedent for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon before he was to become sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier effort as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written very much astutely roughly the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that scads others compel ought to мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an attempt to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined discharge entertain identified, to look to the admissible days of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the supervision of the next juncture of my own uninterrupted research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Hull’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of over is a specific form of user-generated content – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the express good of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate use into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos power display, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a bounteous pursuit, a unfamiliar if unexpected operating for porn output and consumption.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663089403 |