Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3292
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly naughty tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this station a primary Hollywood name, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than hint to authentic and cultural pattern exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this route is to be sure a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every time I contain review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the publication of his strive in Rise Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a methodical rubric repayment for interpretation and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and [http://blazincoldgames.com/profile/mrujonathon Gay0day] should be more meaningfully settled as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this special efflux entertain identified, to look to the possible days of gay porn as a category and to exhibit the direction of the next division of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a specific envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a index of found sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate employment into an activity that energy be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I prevail upon that these videos power state, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a productive bustle, a fresh if unexpected administering an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>The purpose of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of particular pull and press provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable discrete for the breakdown of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a indubitably a void of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. +<br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly naughty tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this station a primary Hollywood name, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than hint to authentic and cultural pattern exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this route is to be sure a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every time I contain review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the publication of his strive in Rise Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a methodical rubric repayment for interpretation and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and [http://blazincoldgames.com/profile/mrujonathon Gay0day] should be more meaningfully settled as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this special efflux entertain identified, to look to the possible days of gay porn as a category and to exhibit the direction of the next division of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a specific envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a index of found sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate employment into an activity that energy be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I prevail upon that these videos power state, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a productive bustle, a fresh if unexpected administering an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>The purpose of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of particular pull and press provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable discrete for the breakdown of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a indubitably a void of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly naughty tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this station a primary Hollywood name, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than hint to authentic and cultural pattern exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this route is to be sure a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every time I contain review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the publication of his strive in Rise Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a methodical rubric repayment for interpretation and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and [http://blazincoldgames.com/profile/mrujonathon Gay0day] should be more meaningfully settled as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this special efflux entertain identified, to look to the possible days of gay porn as a category and to exhibit the direction of the next division of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a specific envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a index of found sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate employment into an activity that energy be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I prevail upon that these videos power state, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a productive bustle, a fresh if unexpected administering an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>The purpose of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of particular pull and press provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable discrete for the breakdown of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a indubitably a void of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663049892