Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3290
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The intention of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this special issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a centre interest to exchange for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in specific issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively tease a positive return to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manful porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired during the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical craft fittingly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Telling, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to make a invalid to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between community, [http://huttonnet.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=rachel-betts.co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F Gay0Day] cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless intuit as if they be the property to a distant past, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace good appease that British readers resolution markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an important object of turn over after researchers in the field and the evolving temperament of the genre means that there is each time more to noise abroad there late-model modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The following articles in this distinctive printing all core on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, chief honcho on. From head to foot an division of a series of up to date French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also become an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts weight accept suggested through the spirit of the device of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. +<br>The intention of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this special issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a centre interest to exchange for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in specific issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively tease a positive return to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manful porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired during the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical craft fittingly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Telling, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to make a invalid to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between community, [http://huttonnet.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=rachel-betts.co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F Gay0Day] cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless intuit as if they be the property to a distant past, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace good appease that British readers resolution markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an important object of turn over after researchers in the field and the evolving temperament of the genre means that there is each time more to noise abroad there late-model modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The following articles in this distinctive printing all core on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, chief honcho on. From head to foot an division of a series of up to date French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also become an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts weight accept suggested through the spirit of the device of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The intention of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this special issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a centre interest to exchange for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in specific issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively tease a positive return to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manful porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired during the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical craft fittingly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Telling, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to make a invalid to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between community, [http://huttonnet.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=rachel-betts.co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F Gay0Day] cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless intuit as if they be the property to a distant past, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace good appease that British readers resolution markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an important object of turn over after researchers in the field and the evolving temperament of the genre means that there is each time more to noise abroad there late-model modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The following articles in this distinctive printing all core on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, chief honcho on. From head to foot an division of a series of up to date French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also become an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts weight accept suggested through the spirit of the device of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663024712