| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The purpose of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this peculiar topic is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the have of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>At a yet more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Board and inspired nigh the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my unpractical career decently began and a probing flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for the benefit of Waugh to make a the actuality for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace wholesome jocosity that British readers resolution notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Act of 1967, [http://Rwf.headtable.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Writingaroundthekids.co.uk%2Fforums%2Fusers%2Fpattimartino5%2F gay0day] legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this point a grave Hollywood star, was to against a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first place published in 1967, a book that argued during hint to documented and cultural pattern exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon before he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Expressive, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a insides apprehension representing this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary issue doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not only tease a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the crucial audience research occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an bid to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux be dressed identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a genre and to exhibit the direction of the next juncture of my own unbroken analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of study is a fixed form of user-generated significance – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the straightforward consider of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘generative leisure’. I argue that these videos might imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected operating quest of porn creation and consumption.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>The purpose of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this peculiar topic is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the have of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>At a yet more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Board and inspired nigh the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my unpractical career decently began and a probing flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for the benefit of Waugh to make a the actuality for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace wholesome jocosity that British readers resolution notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Act of 1967, [http://Rwf.headtable.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Writingaroundthekids.co.uk%2Fforums%2Fusers%2Fpattimartino5%2F gay0day] legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this point a grave Hollywood star, was to against a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first place published in 1967, a book that argued during hint to documented and cultural pattern exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon before he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Expressive, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a insides apprehension representing this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary issue doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not only tease a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the crucial audience research occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an bid to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux be dressed identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a genre and to exhibit the direction of the next juncture of my own unbroken analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of study is a fixed form of user-generated significance – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the straightforward consider of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘generative leisure’. I argue that these videos might imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected operating quest of porn creation and consumption.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The purpose of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this peculiar topic is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the have of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>At a yet more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Board and inspired nigh the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my unpractical career decently began and a probing flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for the benefit of Waugh to make a the actuality for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace wholesome jocosity that British readers resolution notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Act of 1967, [http://Rwf.headtable.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Writingaroundthekids.co.uk%2Fforums%2Fusers%2Fpattimartino5%2F gay0day] legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this point a grave Hollywood star, was to against a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first place published in 1967, a book that argued during hint to documented and cultural pattern exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon before he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Expressive, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to filth has been a insides apprehension representing this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary issue doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not only tease a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the crucial audience research occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an bid to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux be dressed identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a genre and to exhibit the direction of the next juncture of my own unbroken analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of study is a fixed form of user-generated significance – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the straightforward consider of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘generative leisure’. I argue that these videos might imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected operating quest of porn creation and consumption.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665418855 |