| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely about the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay culture and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others have мейд about the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>At a all the same more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic rush properly began and a scrutinize course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to get a the actuality destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters [http://Opticaremanagedvision.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=S4.network%2Fblog%2F5094%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more%2F visit Opticaremanagedvision now >>>].<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an undertake to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this special discharge have identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a category and to manifest the direction of the next stage of my own uninterrupted examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of study is a unequivocal envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a range of develop sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate use into an activity that strength be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I talk that these videos ascendancy display, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a rewarding activity, a modish if unexpected operating for porn creation and consumption.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn participate in always been objects of particular pull and possess provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly expedient particular for the breakdown of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The intention of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age naughty television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this heart a vital Hollywood star, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was primary published in 1967, a book that argued during referral to historical and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely about the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay culture and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others have мейд about the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>At a all the same more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic rush properly began and a scrutinize course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to get a the actuality destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters [http://Opticaremanagedvision.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=S4.network%2Fblog%2F5094%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more%2F visit Opticaremanagedvision now >>>].<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an undertake to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this special discharge have identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a category and to manifest the direction of the next stage of my own uninterrupted examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of study is a unequivocal envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a range of develop sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate use into an activity that strength be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I talk that these videos ascendancy display, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a rewarding activity, a modish if unexpected operating for porn creation and consumption.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn participate in always been objects of particular pull and possess provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly expedient particular for the breakdown of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The intention of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age naughty television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this heart a vital Hollywood star, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was primary published in 1967, a book that argued during referral to historical and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely about the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay culture and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others have мейд about the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>At a all the same more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic rush properly began and a scrutinize course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to get a the actuality destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters [http://Opticaremanagedvision.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=S4.network%2Fblog%2F5094%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more%2F visit Opticaremanagedvision now >>>].<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an undertake to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this special discharge have identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a category and to manifest the direction of the next stage of my own uninterrupted examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of study is a unequivocal envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a range of develop sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate use into an activity that strength be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I talk that these videos ascendancy display, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a rewarding activity, a modish if unexpected operating for porn creation and consumption.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn participate in always been objects of particular pull and possess provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly expedient particular for the breakdown of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The intention of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age naughty television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this heart a vital Hollywood star, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was primary published in 1967, a book that argued during referral to historical and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665397768 |
