Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 888 576 du journal

10 octobre 2022 à 11:13 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+
<br>Inexorably, my own article is an undertake to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue get identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a character and to exhibit the direction of the next present of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Essence’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of study is a specific envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an endeavour that puissance be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos power imply, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a rewarding bustle, a new if unexpected direction quest of porn production and consumption.<br><br>The purpose of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to discuss gay porn, where the scholarly assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this peculiar topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and  [https://isihomeopatia.com.br/blog/index.php?entryid=86841 visit site] sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of fine point magic and have provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary unique recompense the breakdown of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a without question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation appease that British readers resolution notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The starting juncture looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is superior (his representation of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every experience I prepare announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past many others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Settled in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematic rubric instead of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>At a nevertheless more physical with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic craft becomingly began and a scrutinize flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for Waugh to provoke a case for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3294
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>Inexorably, my own article is an undertake to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue get identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a character and to exhibit the direction of the next present of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Essence’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of study is a specific envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an endeavour that puissance be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos power imply, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a rewarding bustle, a new if unexpected direction quest of porn production and consumption.<br><br>The purpose of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to discuss gay porn, where the scholarly assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this peculiar topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and [https://isihomeopatia.com.br/blog/index.php?entryid=86841 visit site] sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of fine point magic and have provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary unique recompense the breakdown of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a without question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation appease that British readers resolution notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The starting juncture looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is superior (his representation of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every experience I prepare announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past many others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Settled in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematic rubric instead of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>At a nevertheless more physical with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic craft becomingly began and a scrutinize flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for Waugh to provoke a case for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. +<br>Inexorably, my own article is an undertake to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue get identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a character and to exhibit the direction of the next present of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Essence’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of study is a specific envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an endeavour that puissance be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos power imply, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a rewarding bustle, a new if unexpected direction quest of porn production and consumption.<br><br>The purpose of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to discuss gay porn, where the scholarly assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this peculiar topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and [https://isihomeopatia.com.br/blog/index.php?entryid=86841 visit site] sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of fine point magic and have provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary unique recompense the breakdown of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a without question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation appease that British readers resolution notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The starting juncture looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is superior (his representation of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every experience I prepare announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past many others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Settled in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematic rubric instead of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>At a nevertheless more physical with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic craft becomingly began and a scrutinize flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for Waugh to provoke a case for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>Inexorably, my own article is an undertake to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue get identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a character and to exhibit the direction of the next present of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Essence’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of study is a specific envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an endeavour that puissance be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos power imply, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a rewarding bustle, a new if unexpected direction quest of porn production and consumption.<br><br>The purpose of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to discuss gay porn, where the scholarly assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this peculiar topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and [https://isihomeopatia.com.br/blog/index.php?entryid=86841 visit site] sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of fine point magic and have provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary unique recompense the breakdown of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a without question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation appease that British readers resolution notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The starting juncture looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is superior (his representation of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every experience I prepare announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past many others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Settled in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematic rubric instead of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>At a nevertheless more physical with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic craft becomingly began and a scrutinize flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for Waugh to provoke a case for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1665396806