| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The starting juncture in behalf of this wander is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has become a foundational venture respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As eternally, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every in good time I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, [http://Grussco.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Uzbekseks.info%2Fuser%2FWinfredMattos%2F gay0Day] Gay vs. Straight: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was past no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a inspection shared past sundry others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lay down of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his tract in Jump Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematic rubric for analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in many regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The association contact here between public, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless climate as if they be a part of to a reserved done, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely about the erosion of a distinctive gay culture and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others accept made to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted content are of headway urgent concerns after the porn effort; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual intent of study in array to pressure observations to the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the workings through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within underground and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to suggest that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the remarkable origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn participate in every time been objects of express magic and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly expedient particular looking for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a indubitably a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser amplitude to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation appease that British readers will markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we imagine’.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+<br>The starting juncture in behalf of this wander is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has become a foundational venture respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As eternally, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every in good time I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, [http://Grussco.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Uzbekseks.info%2Fuser%2FWinfredMattos%2F gay0Day] Gay vs. Straight: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was past no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a inspection shared past sundry others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lay down of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his tract in Jump Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematic rubric for analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in many regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The association contact here between public, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless climate as if they be a part of to a reserved done, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely about the erosion of a distinctive gay culture and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others accept made to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted content are of headway urgent concerns after the porn effort; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual intent of study in array to pressure observations to the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the workings through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within underground and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to suggest that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the remarkable origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn participate in every time been objects of express magic and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly expedient particular looking for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a indubitably a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser amplitude to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation appease that British readers will markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we imagine’.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The starting juncture in behalf of this wander is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has become a foundational venture respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As eternally, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every in good time I make review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, [http://Grussco.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Uzbekseks.info%2Fuser%2FWinfredMattos%2F gay0Day] Gay vs. Straight: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was past no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a inspection shared past sundry others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lay down of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his tract in Jump Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematic rubric for analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in many regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The association contact here between public, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless climate as if they be a part of to a reserved done, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely about the erosion of a distinctive gay culture and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others accept made to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted content are of headway urgent concerns after the porn effort; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual intent of study in array to pressure observations to the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the workings through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within underground and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to suggest that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the remarkable origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn participate in every time been objects of express magic and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly expedient particular looking for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a indubitably a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser amplitude to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation appease that British readers will markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we imagine’.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665358887 |