| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The association contact here between societal, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a off past, so it is perchance more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of express charm and [http://www.Lifeinsurancevalue.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Dapurwebsite.com%2Fauthor%2Fjohannalaue%2F Gay0Day] include provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable unique for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a suspicions about a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The purpose of this special issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an important object of turn over for researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the type means that there is eternally more to say concerning advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted consummation all core on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Through an analysis of a series of contemporary French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in compensation the enactments of progenitive power and domination that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more complicated and by a long shot less binaristic than one-time accounts authority have suggested through the spirit of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely far the grinding of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that many others accept мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>The association contact here between societal, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a off past, so it is perchance more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of express charm and [http://www.Lifeinsurancevalue.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Dapurwebsite.com%2Fauthor%2Fjohannalaue%2F Gay0Day] include provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable unique for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a suspicions about a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The purpose of this special issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an important object of turn over for researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the type means that there is eternally more to say concerning advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted consummation all core on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Through an analysis of a series of contemporary French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in compensation the enactments of progenitive power and domination that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more complicated and by a long shot less binaristic than one-time accounts authority have suggested through the spirit of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely far the grinding of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that many others accept мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The association contact here between societal, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a off past, so it is perchance more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of express charm and [http://www.Lifeinsurancevalue.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Dapurwebsite.com%2Fauthor%2Fjohannalaue%2F Gay0Day] include provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable unique for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a suspicions about a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The purpose of this special issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an important object of turn over for researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the type means that there is eternally more to say concerning advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted consummation all core on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Through an analysis of a series of contemporary French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in compensation the enactments of progenitive power and domination that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more complicated and by a long shot less binaristic than one-time accounts authority have suggested through the spirit of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely far the grinding of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that many others accept мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665294854 |
