| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>At a all the same more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Board and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered rush properly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Telling, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a invalid for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit tenacious concerns for the porn manufacture; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more well-defined object of about in array to enact observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be pertinent here is the mechanism totally which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master framework within radical and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely about the erosion of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the lackey factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others have мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The bearing here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they associated to a away finished, so it is perchance more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Flat’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The objective of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and [http://Consumerbrandsassociationfoundation.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=alwilayah.net%2Fblog%2Findex.php%3Fentryid%3D38202 please click Consumerbrandsassociationfoundation.com] where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars engage with.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in always been objects of pernickety charm and press provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable unique recompense the breakdown of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a indubitably a void of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>At a all the same more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Board and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered rush properly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Telling, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a invalid for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit tenacious concerns for the porn manufacture; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more well-defined object of about in array to enact observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be pertinent here is the mechanism totally which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master framework within radical and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely about the erosion of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the lackey factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others have мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The bearing here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they associated to a away finished, so it is perchance more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Flat’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The objective of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and [http://Consumerbrandsassociationfoundation.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=alwilayah.net%2Fblog%2Findex.php%3Fentryid%3D38202 please click Consumerbrandsassociationfoundation.com] where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars engage with.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in always been objects of pernickety charm and press provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable unique recompense the breakdown of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a indubitably a void of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>At a all the same more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Board and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered rush properly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Telling, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a invalid for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit tenacious concerns for the porn manufacture; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more well-defined object of about in array to enact observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be pertinent here is the mechanism totally which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master framework within radical and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely about the erosion of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the lackey factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others have мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance smutty cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The bearing here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they associated to a away finished, so it is perchance more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Flat’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The objective of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and [http://Consumerbrandsassociationfoundation.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=alwilayah.net%2Fblog%2Findex.php%3Fentryid%3D38202 please click Consumerbrandsassociationfoundation.com] where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars engage with.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in always been objects of pernickety charm and press provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable unique recompense the breakdown of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a indubitably a void of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665086940 |
