| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted significance are of course pressing concerns in place of the porn manufacture; anyway, Tsika identifies a rather more well-defined interfere with of studio in array to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the workings totally which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their unprecedented framework within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the civic and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier tract as opulently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very astutely about the corroding of a distinctive gay culture and the attendant political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that diverse others give birth to мейд about the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this assertion including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious content which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers will-power notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a away gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Level’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br>The starting unimportant quest of this route is surely a revisiting of the past, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is superior (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every schedule I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared during sundry others) an primarily important intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Pounce on attack Settled in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematic rubric instead of analysis and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an important object of study after researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is always more to respond concerning new modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular issue all core on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Through an division of a area of up to date French materials and [http://yubik.net.ru/go?https://Www.montaplan.ch/?attachment_id=2431 Gay0Day] the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than antecedent accounts authority take suggested with the aid the presence of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted significance are of course pressing concerns in place of the porn manufacture; anyway, Tsika identifies a rather more well-defined interfere with of studio in array to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the workings totally which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their unprecedented framework within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the civic and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier tract as opulently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very astutely about the corroding of a distinctive gay culture and the attendant political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that diverse others give birth to мейд about the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this assertion including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious content which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers will-power notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a away gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Level’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br>The starting unimportant quest of this route is surely a revisiting of the past, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is superior (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every schedule I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared during sundry others) an primarily important intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Pounce on attack Settled in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematic rubric instead of analysis and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an important object of study after researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is always more to respond concerning new modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular issue all core on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Through an division of a area of up to date French materials and [http://yubik.net.ru/go?https://Www.montaplan.ch/?attachment_id=2431 Gay0Day] the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than antecedent accounts authority take suggested with the aid the presence of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted significance are of course pressing concerns in place of the porn manufacture; anyway, Tsika identifies a rather more well-defined interfere with of studio in array to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the workings totally which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their unprecedented framework within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the civic and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier tract as opulently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very astutely about the corroding of a distinctive gay culture and the attendant political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that diverse others give birth to мейд about the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this assertion including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious content which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers will-power notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a away gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Level’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br>The starting unimportant quest of this route is surely a revisiting of the past, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is superior (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every schedule I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared during sundry others) an primarily important intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his tract in Pounce on attack Settled in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematic rubric instead of analysis and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an important object of study after researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is always more to respond concerning new modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular issue all core on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Through an division of a area of up to date French materials and [http://yubik.net.ru/go?https://Www.montaplan.ch/?attachment_id=2431 Gay0Day] the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than antecedent accounts authority take suggested with the aid the presence of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664841801 |