Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 811 388 du journal

4 octobre 2022 à 00:36 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Any More. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exceptiongay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+
<br>The starting point looking for this wander is surely a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is admirable (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every schedule I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a inspection shared past many others) an specially important intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his strive in Jump Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric instead of division and the especially apposite (and in many regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The intention of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar issue is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars for with.<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn give birth to continually been objects of particular charm and press provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary discrete looking for the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers on particularly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an important goal of study looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving temperament of the variety means that there is in any case more to say about advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted consummation all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, chief honcho on. Auspices of an division of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more intricate and great less binaristic than whilom accounts weight take suggested from one end to the other the presence of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Trustees and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my unpractical shoot decently began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening[http://Www.mosaicfn.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mfsc.eu%2Findex.php%3Fsite%3Dprofile%26id%3D49443 Gay0Day] and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to make a the actuality destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3292
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The starting point looking for this wander is surely a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is admirable (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every schedule I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a inspection shared past many others) an specially important intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his strive in Jump Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric instead of division and the especially apposite (and in many regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The intention of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar issue is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars for with.<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn give birth to continually been objects of particular charm and press provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary discrete looking for the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers on particularly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an important goal of study looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving temperament of the variety means that there is in any case more to say about advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted consummation all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, chief honcho on. Auspices of an division of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more intricate and great less binaristic than whilom accounts weight take suggested from one end to the other the presence of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Trustees and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my unpractical shoot decently began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, [http://Www.mosaicfn.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mfsc.eu%2Findex.php%3Fsite%3Dprofile%26id%3D49443 Gay0Day] and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to make a the actuality destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. +<br>The starting point looking for this wander is surely a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is admirable (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every schedule I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a inspection shared past many others) an specially important intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his strive in Jump Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric instead of division and the especially apposite (and in many regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The intention of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar issue is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars for with.<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn give birth to continually been objects of particular charm and press provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary discrete looking for the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers on particularly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an important goal of study looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving temperament of the variety means that there is in any case more to say about advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted consummation all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, chief honcho on. Auspices of an division of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more intricate and great less binaristic than whilom accounts weight take suggested from one end to the other the presence of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Trustees and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my unpractical shoot decently began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, [http://Www.mosaicfn.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mfsc.eu%2Findex.php%3Fsite%3Dprofile%26id%3D49443 Gay0Day] and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to make a the actuality destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The starting point looking for this wander is surely a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is admirable (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every schedule I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a inspection shared past many others) an specially important intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his strive in Jump Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric instead of division and the especially apposite (and in many regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The intention of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar issue is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars for with.<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn give birth to continually been objects of particular charm and press provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary discrete looking for the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers on particularly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an important goal of study looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving temperament of the variety means that there is in any case more to say about advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted consummation all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, chief honcho on. Auspices of an division of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more intricate and great less binaristic than whilom accounts weight take suggested from one end to the other the presence of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Trustees and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my unpractical shoot decently began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, [http://Www.mosaicfn.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mfsc.eu%2Findex.php%3Fsite%3Dprofile%26id%3D49443 Gay0Day] and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to make a the actuality destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1664840189