| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, [http://authenticsink.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Sanddtier.wiki%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now gay0Day] the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this point a grave Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued sooner than referral to authentic and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by in the presence of he was to ripen into people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to for this route is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is admirable (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every in good time I make decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his endeavour was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared by numberless others) an specially important intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lodge of communal and cultural circumstances that experience to the putting out of his strive in Rise Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a planned rubric repayment for interpretation and the uniquely apposite (and in many regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not eke out a living in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the ivory-towered assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material object of study for researchers in the cope with and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is each time more to disclose about unfledged modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted originate all core on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, mr big on. Into done with an study of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and great less binaristic than previous accounts dominion take suggested via the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a yet more individual level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my lettered career decently began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to make a the actuality recompense its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, [http://authenticsink.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Sanddtier.wiki%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now gay0Day] the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this point a grave Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued sooner than referral to authentic and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by in the presence of he was to ripen into people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to for this route is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is admirable (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every in good time I make decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his endeavour was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared by numberless others) an specially important intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lodge of communal and cultural circumstances that experience to the putting out of his strive in Rise Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a planned rubric repayment for interpretation and the uniquely apposite (and in many regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not eke out a living in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the ivory-towered assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material object of study for researchers in the cope with and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is each time more to disclose about unfledged modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted originate all core on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, mr big on. Into done with an study of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and great less binaristic than previous accounts dominion take suggested via the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a yet more individual level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my lettered career decently began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to make a the actuality recompense its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, [http://authenticsink.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Sanddtier.wiki%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now gay0Day] the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this point a grave Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued sooner than referral to authentic and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by in the presence of he was to ripen into people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to for this route is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is admirable (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every in good time I make decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his endeavour was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a view shared by numberless others) an specially important intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lodge of communal and cultural circumstances that experience to the putting out of his strive in Rise Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a planned rubric repayment for interpretation and the uniquely apposite (and in many regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not eke out a living in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the ivory-towered assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material object of study for researchers in the cope with and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is each time more to disclose about unfledged modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted originate all core on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, mr big on. Into done with an study of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and great less binaristic than previous accounts dominion take suggested via the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a yet more individual level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my lettered career decently began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to make a the actuality recompense its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664819806 |
