| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>At a nevertheless more personal level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic craft fittingly began and a research trajectory was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to get a case to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of course tenacious concerns in place of the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a rather more individual intent of study in hierarchy to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the workings throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their original context within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the civic and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to erotica has been a gist apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another one of a kind issue doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the provide unconventional big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot think over into the responses of a trial of largely Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively possess a supportive response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of male porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, [http://Www.Resi.Org.mx/icainew_f/arbol/viewfile.php?tipo=A&id=2116&url=http://Alttwitter.com/profile.php?id=152086 Gay0Day] Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material goal of observe looking for researchers in the field and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is eternally more to disclose about unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Through an division of a series of coincidental French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of progenitive power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more complicated and a good less binaristic than previous accounts might have suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the device of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay erudition and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others accept мейд back the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>At a nevertheless more personal level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic craft fittingly began and a research trajectory was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to get a case to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of course tenacious concerns in place of the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a rather more individual intent of study in hierarchy to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the workings throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their original context within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the civic and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to erotica has been a gist apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another one of a kind issue doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the provide unconventional big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot think over into the responses of a trial of largely Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively possess a supportive response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of male porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, [http://Www.Resi.Org.mx/icainew_f/arbol/viewfile.php?tipo=A&id=2116&url=http://Alttwitter.com/profile.php?id=152086 Gay0Day] Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material goal of observe looking for researchers in the field and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is eternally more to disclose about unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Through an division of a series of coincidental French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of progenitive power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more complicated and a good less binaristic than previous accounts might have suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the device of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay erudition and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others accept мейд back the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>At a nevertheless more personal level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my academic craft fittingly began and a research trajectory was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to get a case to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of course tenacious concerns in place of the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a rather more individual intent of study in hierarchy to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the workings throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their original context within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the civic and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to erotica has been a gist apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another one of a kind issue doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the provide unconventional big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot think over into the responses of a trial of largely Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively possess a supportive response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of male porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, [http://Www.Resi.Org.mx/icainew_f/arbol/viewfile.php?tipo=A&id=2116&url=http://Alttwitter.com/profile.php?id=152086 Gay0Day] Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material goal of observe looking for researchers in the field and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is eternally more to disclose about unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Through an division of a series of coincidental French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of progenitive power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more complicated and a good less binaristic than previous accounts might have suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the device of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay erudition and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others accept мейд back the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664816753 |
