| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The purpose of this distinctive issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an bid to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge get identified, to look to the workable future of gay porn as a variety and to call the supervision of the next juncture of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my target of over is a specific form of user-generated size – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a range of initiate sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘generative recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy state, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a bounteous bustle, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn output and consumption.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely far the grinding of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others give birth to made to the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic satisfied which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a major Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was opening published in 1967, a enlist that argued during notification to factual and cultural example exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting point looking for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the days, [https://alimuna.com/blog/index.php?entryid=78082 alimuna.Com] and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is admirable (his history of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every schedule I prepare decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his effort in Ignore Grieve in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric instead of analysis and the especially apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) criticism that gay porn does not exist in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>The purpose of this distinctive issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an bid to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge get identified, to look to the workable future of gay porn as a variety and to call the supervision of the next juncture of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my target of over is a specific form of user-generated size – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a range of initiate sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘generative recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy state, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a bounteous bustle, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn output and consumption.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely far the grinding of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others give birth to made to the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic satisfied which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a major Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was opening published in 1967, a enlist that argued during notification to factual and cultural example exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting point looking for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the days, [https://alimuna.com/blog/index.php?entryid=78082 alimuna.Com] and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is admirable (his history of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every schedule I prepare decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his effort in Ignore Grieve in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric instead of analysis and the especially apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) criticism that gay porn does not exist in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The purpose of this distinctive issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an bid to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge get identified, to look to the workable future of gay porn as a variety and to call the supervision of the next juncture of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my target of over is a specific form of user-generated size – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a range of initiate sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘generative recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy state, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a bounteous bustle, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn output and consumption.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely far the grinding of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others give birth to made to the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic satisfied which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a major Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was opening published in 1967, a enlist that argued during notification to factual and cultural example exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The starting point looking for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the days, [https://alimuna.com/blog/index.php?entryid=78082 alimuna.Com] and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational essay on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is admirable (his history of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every schedule I prepare decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his effort in Ignore Grieve in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric instead of analysis and the especially apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) criticism that gay porn does not exist in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664812459 |
