| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>I connected with to a cultural and national ambiance – the urban gay male community/ies – in which salacious pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit urgent concerns in place of the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous object of about in order to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the machine throughout which variously lewd or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master situation within radical and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the political and cultural power of the queer provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The association contact here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a distant done, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is then during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an important focus of study for researchers in the field and the evolving nature of the type means that there is each time more to respond there unfledged modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted originate all core on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, chief honcho on. Through an study of a area of contemporary French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in compensation the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested via the confidence of the apparatus of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this odyssey is surely a revisiting of the past, and [http://Le-Juste-Prix.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=rachel-betts.Co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F cool training] I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his history of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a Personal Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared during numberless others) an especially worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his tract in Rise Cut in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric instead of analysis and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards divinatory) observation that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the erosion of a characteristic gay sophistication and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that many others have мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious content which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>I connected with to a cultural and national ambiance – the urban gay male community/ies – in which salacious pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit urgent concerns in place of the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous object of about in order to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the machine throughout which variously lewd or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master situation within radical and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the political and cultural power of the queer provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The association contact here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a distant done, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is then during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an important focus of study for researchers in the field and the evolving nature of the type means that there is each time more to respond there unfledged modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted originate all core on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, chief honcho on. Through an study of a area of contemporary French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in compensation the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested via the confidence of the apparatus of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this odyssey is surely a revisiting of the past, and [http://Le-Juste-Prix.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=rachel-betts.Co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F cool training] I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his history of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a Personal Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared during numberless others) an especially worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his tract in Rise Cut in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric instead of analysis and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards divinatory) observation that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the erosion of a characteristic gay sophistication and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that many others have мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious content which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>I connected with to a cultural and national ambiance – the urban gay male community/ies – in which salacious pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit urgent concerns in place of the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous object of about in order to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the machine throughout which variously lewd or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master situation within radical and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the political and cultural power of the queer provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The association contact here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a distant done, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is then during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an important focus of study for researchers in the field and the evolving nature of the type means that there is each time more to respond there unfledged modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted originate all core on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, chief honcho on. Through an study of a area of contemporary French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in compensation the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested via the confidence of the apparatus of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this odyssey is surely a revisiting of the past, and [http://Le-Juste-Prix.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=rachel-betts.Co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F cool training] I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his history of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a Personal Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared during numberless others) an especially worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his tract in Rise Cut in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric instead of analysis and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards divinatory) observation that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the erosion of a characteristic gay sophistication and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that many others have мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious content which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664745382 |
