Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 794 138 du journal

1 octobre 2022 à 20:19 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+
<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of course urgent concerns in place of the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of about in hierarchy to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality concern here is the machine through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within sunken and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to smut has been a centre apprehension exchange for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another extraordinary consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide specific climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely tease a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the divergent audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience check out occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The starting unimportant in behalf of this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational try for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared past many others) an specially important intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the publication of his tract in Jump Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematic rubric repayment for analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards divinatory) criticism that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods,  [https://Www.ondist.ru/news/externallink.php?link=https://Xn--80aajajavo3ag2a3c5b.xn--p1ai/2022/09/22/introduction-gay-porn-right-away-10/ Www.ondist.ru] ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars for with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty object of turn over looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is eternally more to disclose about unfledged modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this special issue all core on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, head on. Through an analysis of a range of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and domination that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts weight take suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the implement of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3294
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of course urgent concerns in place of the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of about in hierarchy to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality concern here is the machine through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within sunken and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to smut has been a centre apprehension exchange for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another extraordinary consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide specific climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely tease a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the divergent audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience check out occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The starting unimportant in behalf of this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational try for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared past many others) an specially important intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the publication of his tract in Jump Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematic rubric repayment for analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards divinatory) criticism that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, [https://Www.ondist.ru/news/externallink.php?link=https://Xn--80aajajavo3ag2a3c5b.xn--p1ai/2022/09/22/introduction-gay-porn-right-away-10/ Www.ondist.ru] ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars for with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty object of turn over looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is eternally more to disclose about unfledged modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this special issue all core on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, head on. Through an analysis of a range of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and domination that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts weight take suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the implement of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. +<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of course urgent concerns in place of the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of about in hierarchy to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality concern here is the machine through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within sunken and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to smut has been a centre apprehension exchange for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another extraordinary consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide specific climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely tease a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the divergent audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience check out occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The starting unimportant in behalf of this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational try for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared past many others) an specially important intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the publication of his tract in Jump Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematic rubric repayment for analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards divinatory) criticism that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, [https://Www.ondist.ru/news/externallink.php?link=https://Xn--80aajajavo3ag2a3c5b.xn--p1ai/2022/09/22/introduction-gay-porn-right-away-10/ Www.ondist.ru] ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars for with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty object of turn over looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is eternally more to disclose about unfledged modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this special issue all core on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, head on. Through an analysis of a range of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and domination that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts weight take suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the implement of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of course urgent concerns in place of the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of about in hierarchy to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality concern here is the machine through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within sunken and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to smut has been a centre apprehension exchange for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another extraordinary consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide specific climax, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely tease a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the divergent audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience check out occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The starting unimportant in behalf of this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational try for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared past many others) an specially important intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the publication of his tract in Jump Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematic rubric repayment for analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards divinatory) criticism that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, [https://Www.ondist.ru/news/externallink.php?link=https://Xn--80aajajavo3ag2a3c5b.xn--p1ai/2022/09/22/introduction-gay-porn-right-away-10/ Www.ondist.ru] ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars for with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty object of turn over looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is eternally more to disclose about unfledged modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this special issue all core on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, head on. Through an analysis of a range of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and domination that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts weight take suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the implement of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1664651943