| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of pernickety pull and have provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly salutary unique looking for the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a question a routine of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser amplitude to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace wholesome jocosity that British readers will very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Research Trustees and inspired nigh the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my academic shoot properly began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to get a case recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal context – the urban gay male community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they be the property to a reserved gone, so it is perhaps more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of undoubtedly tenacious concerns after the porn manufacture; in any case, Tsika identifies a fairly more well-defined interfere with of about in regularity to enact observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the machine throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original situation within sunken and queer cinema and [https://Www.Allcasino.org/goto.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly9qb2FubmEtZnJpc29lci5kay8yMDE2LzA4LzE2L2hhaXJzYWxvbi1hdWRpby1wb3N0LWZvcm1hdC8 Gay0Day] repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the remarkable authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The intention of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars engage with.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of pernickety pull and have provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly salutary unique looking for the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a question a routine of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser amplitude to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace wholesome jocosity that British readers will very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Research Trustees and inspired nigh the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my academic shoot properly began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to get a case recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal context – the urban gay male community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they be the property to a reserved gone, so it is perhaps more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of undoubtedly tenacious concerns after the porn manufacture; in any case, Tsika identifies a fairly more well-defined interfere with of about in regularity to enact observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the machine throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original situation within sunken and queer cinema and [https://Www.Allcasino.org/goto.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly9qb2FubmEtZnJpc29lci5kay8yMDE2LzA4LzE2L2hhaXJzYWxvbi1hdWRpby1wb3N0LWZvcm1hdC8 Gay0Day] repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the remarkable authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The intention of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars engage with.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of pernickety pull and have provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly salutary unique looking for the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a question a routine of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser amplitude to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace wholesome jocosity that British readers will very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Research Trustees and inspired nigh the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my academic shoot properly began and a research flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to get a case recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal context – the urban gay male community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they be the property to a reserved gone, so it is perhaps more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of undoubtedly tenacious concerns after the porn manufacture; in any case, Tsika identifies a fairly more well-defined interfere with of about in regularity to enact observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the machine throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original situation within sunken and queer cinema and [https://Www.Allcasino.org/goto.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly9qb2FubmEtZnJpc29lci5kay8yMDE2LzA4LzE2L2hhaXJzYWxvbi1hdWRpby1wb3N0LWZvcm1hdC8 Gay0Day] repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the remarkable authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The intention of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to capture the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars engage with.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664576774 |
