| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to discuss gay porn, where the intellectual assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and [http://Royalcloaks.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Werner-Rathgeb.de%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now Gay0day] objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an conspicuous object of study for researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is in any case more to say there new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this concerted issue all core on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, head on. Through an division of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account for the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts might have suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted significance are of course urgent concerns for the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual tangible of study in order to make observations forth the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the machine through which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their master situation within resistance and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely about the erosion of a distinguishing gay savoir faire and the accessory factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that many others accept made back the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue have identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a character and to call the way of the next present of my own unbroken research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Carcass’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of study is a fixed type of user-generated load – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a index of build sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an endeavour that strength be regarded as ‘productive leisure’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding activity, a new if unexpected directorate in support of porn creation and consumption.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to discuss gay porn, where the intellectual assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and [http://Royalcloaks.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Werner-Rathgeb.de%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now Gay0day] objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an conspicuous object of study for researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is in any case more to say there new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this concerted issue all core on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, head on. Through an division of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account for the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts might have suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted significance are of course urgent concerns for the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual tangible of study in order to make observations forth the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the machine through which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their master situation within resistance and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely about the erosion of a distinguishing gay savoir faire and the accessory factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that many others accept made back the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue have identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a character and to call the way of the next present of my own unbroken research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Carcass’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of study is a fixed type of user-generated load – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a index of build sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an endeavour that strength be regarded as ‘productive leisure’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding activity, a new if unexpected directorate in support of porn creation and consumption.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to discuss gay porn, where the intellectual assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to emblazon the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and [http://Royalcloaks.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Werner-Rathgeb.de%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now Gay0day] objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an conspicuous object of study for researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is in any case more to say there new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this concerted issue all core on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, head on. Through an division of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account for the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts might have suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted significance are of course urgent concerns for the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual tangible of study in order to make observations forth the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the machine through which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their master situation within resistance and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely about the erosion of a distinguishing gay savoir faire and the accessory factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that many others accept made back the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined issue have identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a character and to call the way of the next present of my own unbroken research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Carcass’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of study is a fixed type of user-generated load – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a index of build sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an endeavour that strength be regarded as ‘productive leisure’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding activity, a new if unexpected directorate in support of porn creation and consumption.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663249020 |
