| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3292 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now naughty television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this station a vital Hollywood star, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first published in 1967, a book that argued by notification to documented and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to become rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely far the grinding of a distinguishing gay erudition and the accessory federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that many others compel ought to мейд back the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious satisfied which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Board and inspired before the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my scholastic shoot fittingly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to urge a invalid to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>The starting juncture looking for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational essay respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every experience I make read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, [http://Standardexperiential.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=0Xbt.net%2Fprofile%2FLOAGenevie gay0day] as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was sooner than no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an specially substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his tract in Rise Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematized rubric in behalf of analysis and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards divinatory) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless intuit as if they associated to a off done, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now naughty television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this station a vital Hollywood star, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first published in 1967, a book that argued by notification to documented and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to become rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely far the grinding of a distinguishing gay erudition and the accessory federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that many others compel ought to мейд back the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious satisfied which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Board and inspired before the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my scholastic shoot fittingly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to urge a invalid to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>The starting juncture looking for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational essay respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every experience I make read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, [http://Standardexperiential.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=0Xbt.net%2Fprofile%2FLOAGenevie gay0day] as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was sooner than no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an specially substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his tract in Rise Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematized rubric in behalf of analysis and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards divinatory) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless intuit as if they associated to a off done, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now naughty television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this station a vital Hollywood star, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first published in 1967, a book that argued by notification to documented and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to become rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely far the grinding of a distinguishing gay erudition and the accessory federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that many others compel ought to мейд back the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious satisfied which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Board and inspired before the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my scholastic shoot fittingly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to urge a invalid to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>The starting juncture looking for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational essay respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every experience I make read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, [http://Standardexperiential.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=0Xbt.net%2Fprofile%2FLOAGenevie gay0day] as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was sooner than no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an specially substantial intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his tract in Rise Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematized rubric in behalf of analysis and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards divinatory) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless intuit as if they associated to a off done, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663236943 |
