| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of headway tenacious concerns payment the porn manufacture; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more well-defined intent of contemplate in regularity to enact observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood bear on here is the mechanism totally which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original frame of reference within resistance and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the political and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this special egress entertain identified, to look to the workable future of gay porn as a character and to manifest the direction of the next juncture of my own uninterrupted inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my destination of cramming is a spelt blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘generative recreation’. I argue that these videos power state, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a productive operation, a new if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic appease that British readers on markedly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the record themes that Waugh has identified, [http://inproconsultinggroup.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Wiki-Hope-Etudiant.Grenoble-Inp.fr%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away Gay0Day] and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely give the corroding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the lackey civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others compel ought to мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic cheerful which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a core shtick pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the provide specific big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a taste of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively tease a positive response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of headway tenacious concerns payment the porn manufacture; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more well-defined intent of contemplate in regularity to enact observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood bear on here is the mechanism totally which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original frame of reference within resistance and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the political and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this special egress entertain identified, to look to the workable future of gay porn as a character and to manifest the direction of the next juncture of my own uninterrupted inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my destination of cramming is a spelt blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘generative recreation’. I argue that these videos power state, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a productive operation, a new if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic appease that British readers on markedly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the record themes that Waugh has identified, [http://inproconsultinggroup.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Wiki-Hope-Etudiant.Grenoble-Inp.fr%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away Gay0Day] and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely give the corroding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the lackey civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others compel ought to мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic cheerful which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a core shtick pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the provide specific big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a taste of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively tease a positive response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of headway tenacious concerns payment the porn manufacture; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more well-defined intent of contemplate in regularity to enact observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood bear on here is the mechanism totally which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original frame of reference within resistance and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the political and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this special egress entertain identified, to look to the workable future of gay porn as a character and to manifest the direction of the next juncture of my own uninterrupted inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my destination of cramming is a spelt blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘generative recreation’. I argue that these videos power state, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a productive operation, a new if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic appease that British readers on markedly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the record themes that Waugh has identified, [http://inproconsultinggroup.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Wiki-Hope-Etudiant.Grenoble-Inp.fr%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away Gay0Day] and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely give the corroding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the lackey civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others compel ought to мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic cheerful which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a core shtick pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the provide specific big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a taste of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively tease a positive response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663220825 |
