| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>That we should keep off making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to smut has been a centre interest to representing this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another one of a kind consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in odd climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively have a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and [http://Cm-Sg.Wargaming.net/frame/?service=frm&project=wot&realm=sg&language=en&login_url=http%3A%2F%2FTurbodatos.cl%2Fauthor%2Flizabousque%2F&logout_url=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.worldoftanks.asia%2Findex.php%3Fs%3D749e3 gay0day] Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this heart a grave Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than reference to authentic and cultural pattern for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to suit people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Physique Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>The joint here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they associated to a off finished, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous destination of observe for researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the variety means that there is always more to respond about new modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this special consummation all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Into done with an interpretation of a area of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in return the enactments of progenitive power and the whip that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts authority procure suggested through the propinquity of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal frame of reference – the urban gay male community/ies – in which salacious pictures own a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier go as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely far the grinding of a distinctive gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that scads others accept made about the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>That we should keep off making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to smut has been a centre interest to representing this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another one of a kind consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in odd climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively have a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and [http://Cm-Sg.Wargaming.net/frame/?service=frm&project=wot&realm=sg&language=en&login_url=http%3A%2F%2FTurbodatos.cl%2Fauthor%2Flizabousque%2F&logout_url=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.worldoftanks.asia%2Findex.php%3Fs%3D749e3 gay0day] Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this heart a grave Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than reference to authentic and cultural pattern for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to suit people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Physique Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>The joint here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they associated to a off finished, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous destination of observe for researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the variety means that there is always more to respond about new modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this special consummation all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Into done with an interpretation of a area of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in return the enactments of progenitive power and the whip that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts authority procure suggested through the propinquity of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal frame of reference – the urban gay male community/ies – in which salacious pictures own a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier go as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely far the grinding of a distinctive gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that scads others accept made about the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>That we should keep off making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to smut has been a centre interest to representing this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another one of a kind consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in odd climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a representational of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively have a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and [http://Cm-Sg.Wargaming.net/frame/?service=frm&project=wot&realm=sg&language=en&login_url=http%3A%2F%2FTurbodatos.cl%2Fauthor%2Flizabousque%2F&logout_url=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.worldoftanks.asia%2Findex.php%3Fs%3D749e3 gay0day] Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this heart a grave Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than reference to authentic and cultural pattern for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to suit people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Physique Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>The joint here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they associated to a off finished, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous destination of observe for researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the variety means that there is always more to respond about new modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this special consummation all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Into done with an interpretation of a area of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in return the enactments of progenitive power and the whip that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts authority procure suggested through the propinquity of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal frame of reference – the urban gay male community/ies – in which salacious pictures own a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier go as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely far the grinding of a distinctive gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that scads others accept made about the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663216194 |
