| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to erotica has been a centre interest to exchange for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different issue staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the provide specific big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a sample of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not only obtain a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of masculine porn viewers and the crucial audience fact-finding occupation conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, [http://realseal.info/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=sifuwallace.com%2Frare_authentic_traditional_high_level_skills%2Fslider_2_post%2F gay0day] deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of headway urgent concerns payment the porn industry; however, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more specific tangible of contemplate in hierarchy to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be pertinent here is the device through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their unprecedented framework within underground and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to call to mind that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a still more personal with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Stay and inspired during the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my academic rush properly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to make a case to save its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier tract as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely give the grinding of a distinguishing gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that many others accept made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to erotica has been a centre interest to exchange for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different issue staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the provide specific big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a sample of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not only obtain a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of masculine porn viewers and the crucial audience fact-finding occupation conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, [http://realseal.info/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=sifuwallace.com%2Frare_authentic_traditional_high_level_skills%2Fslider_2_post%2F gay0day] deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of headway urgent concerns payment the porn industry; however, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more specific tangible of contemplate in hierarchy to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be pertinent here is the device through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their unprecedented framework within underground and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to call to mind that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a still more personal with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Stay and inspired during the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my academic rush properly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to make a case to save its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier tract as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely give the grinding of a distinguishing gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that many others accept made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to erotica has been a centre interest to exchange for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different issue staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the provide specific big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a sample of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not only obtain a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of masculine porn viewers and the crucial audience fact-finding occupation conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, [http://realseal.info/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=sifuwallace.com%2Frare_authentic_traditional_high_level_skills%2Fslider_2_post%2F gay0day] deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of headway urgent concerns payment the porn industry; however, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more specific tangible of contemplate in hierarchy to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be pertinent here is the device through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their unprecedented framework within underground and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to call to mind that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a still more personal with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Stay and inspired during the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my academic rush properly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to make a case to save its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier tract as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely give the grinding of a distinguishing gay erudition and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that many others accept made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663075504 |
