Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
Variable | Valeur |
---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | DarylStrout4 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 0 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Request Rate Threshold Exceeded |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Request Rate Threshold Exceeded |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | [https://crypto-currency.store/ avalon asic bitcoin mining machine] - [https://crypto-currency.store/ https://crypto-currency.store/]. À cela, il est souvent préféré d'utiliser une fédération de nœuds de la chaîne latérale parfois appelés « notaires » pour conserver les actifs. L'ancrage bilatéral pourrait être réalisé par l'intermédiaire un tiers unique qui garderait les actifs (une plateforme d'échange par exemple) mais il est évident que cela n'est pas très sécurisé. Ce contrat permet aussi de récupérer les fonds en cas de problème. Dans le cas de Liquid, c'est la même fédération qui assure le consensus et qui garde les bitcoins. Essentiellement, les bitcoins sont mis en séquestre dans un contrat autonome de multi-signature nécessitant les signatures d'un nombre fixe de membres de la fédération.<br><br>D'autres projets que Bitcoin prévoient d'utiliser les chaînes latérales, notamment les plateformes d'application décentralisées. On peut citer Ethereum avec le protocole Plasma , EOS ou encore Lisk qui utilise une chaîne latérale pour chacune de ses dApps.<br><br>Michael Saylor’s MicroStrategy (MSTR) is up 10%. Among crypto-related stocks on the move are miners Marathon Digital (MARA) up 20%, Hut 8 (HUT) +15%, and Riot Blockchain (RIOT) +15%. Crypto exchange Coinbase (COIN) is ahead 13%, and crypto merchant banker Galaxy Digital (GLXY.TO) is higher by 17%.<br><br>To allow for equitable access to all users, SEC reserves the right to limit requests originating from undeclared automated tools. Your request has been identified as part of a network of automated tools outside of the acceptable policy and will be managed until action is taken to declare your traffic.<br><br>For best practices on efficiently downloading information from SEC.gov, including the latest EDGAR filings, visit sec.gov/developer. You can also sign up for email updates on the SEC open data program, including best practices that make it more efficient to download data, and SEC.gov enhancements that may impact scripted downloading processes. For more information, contact opendata@sec.gov.<br><br>This SEC practice is designed to limit excessive automated searches on SEC.gov and is not intended or expected to impact individuals browsing the SEC.gov website. Once the rate of requests has dropped below the threshold for 10 minutes, the user may resume accessing content on SEC.gov. If a user or application submits more than 10 requests per second, further requests from the IP address(es) may be limited for a brief period.<br><br>I am unable to see how these two theorems mean the same thing. However, in between these two statements, a claim is made that they are equivalent. Any help clarifying why these two are equivalent would be greatly appreciated. And this is where I am having trouble.<br><br>It’s important to realize that an SPV wallet does not merely rely on the other network nodes to determine the longest chain of blocks. And of course, the kind of wallet you run has zero impact on the security of your private keys. Those who are inclined can examine the Electrum code to see this in action. It looks at the best header chain: the chain of valid block headers that has the most cumulative proof of work. A good SPV implementation also ensures that this proof of work is of the appropriate hashing difficulty level.<br><br>It would not take long for those non-compliant nodes to be forked off the network, but during that event, the SPV client could be temporarily fooled into thinking the non-upgraded nodes had the correct longest chain. (After a few more blocks, the longest valid chain would become apparent again.)<br><br>In simplistic terms: good [https://crypto-currency.store/ bitcoin] mining setup One side wants to follow the original Bitcoin idea of peer to peer cash and a plan to have bigger blocks; the other side wants to keep blocks small while transforming bitcoin into a settlement network.<br><br>99.99% of the time, this is not a problem because we can connect to many different nodes and make sure that everyone agrees on the same chain of blocks. Since an SPV wallet doesn’t check any of the other transactions in the block, theoretically the block could be invalid.<br><br>Contrary to popular belief, bitcoin mining servers Fraud Proof SPV and Full Nodes are not significantly more secure then SPV nodes…I am afraid that the current stagnation and abandonment of Bitcoin’s original scaling model is not induced by the absence of Fraud Proofs, but instead by a misunderstanding of Bitcoin’s security and scaling model.<br><br>But is Bitcoin completely anonymous? Some crypto casinos and sports betting portals do allow their users to make deposits and receive payments with a minimum of personal information, or even without it. The most curious will probably want to figure out where the anonymity of BTC transactions ends. In this case, we can really say that they provide an opportunity to play for bitcoin anonymously.<br><br>Armed with this information, you can enjoy peace-of-mind about your bitcoin wallet… and you can also help to defeat some of the nefarious arguments coming from false assumptions. SPV wallets provide a high level of security, and most users do not need to run full nodes. |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-
+[https://crypto-currency.store/ avalon asic bitcoin mining machine] - [https://crypto-currency.store/ https://crypto-currency.store/]. À cela, il est souvent préféré d'utiliser une fédération de nœuds de la chaîne latérale parfois appelés « notaires » pour conserver les actifs. L'ancrage bilatéral pourrait être réalisé par l'intermédiaire un tiers unique qui garderait les actifs (une plateforme d'échange par exemple) mais il est évident que cela n'est pas très sécurisé. Ce contrat permet aussi de récupérer les fonds en cas de problème. Dans le cas de Liquid, c'est la même fédération qui assure le consensus et qui garde les bitcoins. Essentiellement, les bitcoins sont mis en séquestre dans un contrat autonome de multi-signature nécessitant les signatures d'un nombre fixe de membres de la fédération.<br><br>D'autres projets que Bitcoin prévoient d'utiliser les chaînes latérales, notamment les plateformes d'application décentralisées. On peut citer Ethereum avec le protocole Plasma , EOS ou encore Lisk qui utilise une chaîne latérale pour chacune de ses dApps.<br><br>Michael Saylor’s MicroStrategy (MSTR) is up 10%. Among crypto-related stocks on the move are miners Marathon Digital (MARA) up 20%, Hut 8 (HUT) +15%, and Riot Blockchain (RIOT) +15%. Crypto exchange Coinbase (COIN) is ahead 13%, and crypto merchant banker Galaxy Digital (GLXY.TO) is higher by 17%.<br><br>To allow for equitable access to all users, SEC reserves the right to limit requests originating from undeclared automated tools. Your request has been identified as part of a network of automated tools outside of the acceptable policy and will be managed until action is taken to declare your traffic.<br><br>For best practices on efficiently downloading information from SEC.gov, including the latest EDGAR filings, visit sec.gov/developer. You can also sign up for email updates on the SEC open data program, including best practices that make it more efficient to download data, and SEC.gov enhancements that may impact scripted downloading processes. For more information, contact opendata@sec.gov.<br><br>This SEC practice is designed to limit excessive automated searches on SEC.gov and is not intended or expected to impact individuals browsing the SEC.gov website. Once the rate of requests has dropped below the threshold for 10 minutes, the user may resume accessing content on SEC.gov. If a user or application submits more than 10 requests per second, further requests from the IP address(es) may be limited for a brief period.<br><br>I am unable to see how these two theorems mean the same thing. However, in between these two statements, a claim is made that they are equivalent. Any help clarifying why these two are equivalent would be greatly appreciated. And this is where I am having trouble.<br><br>It’s important to realize that an SPV wallet does not merely rely on the other network nodes to determine the longest chain of blocks. And of course, the kind of wallet you run has zero impact on the security of your private keys. Those who are inclined can examine the Electrum code to see this in action. It looks at the best header chain: the chain of valid block headers that has the most cumulative proof of work. A good SPV implementation also ensures that this proof of work is of the appropriate hashing difficulty level.<br><br>It would not take long for those non-compliant nodes to be forked off the network, but during that event, the SPV client could be temporarily fooled into thinking the non-upgraded nodes had the correct longest chain. (After a few more blocks, the longest valid chain would become apparent again.)<br><br>In simplistic terms: good [https://crypto-currency.store/ bitcoin] mining setup One side wants to follow the original Bitcoin idea of peer to peer cash and a plan to have bigger blocks; the other side wants to keep blocks small while transforming bitcoin into a settlement network.<br><br>99.99% of the time, this is not a problem because we can connect to many different nodes and make sure that everyone agrees on the same chain of blocks. Since an SPV wallet doesn’t check any of the other transactions in the block, theoretically the block could be invalid.<br><br>Contrary to popular belief, bitcoin mining servers Fraud Proof SPV and Full Nodes are not significantly more secure then SPV nodes…I am afraid that the current stagnation and abandonment of Bitcoin’s original scaling model is not induced by the absence of Fraud Proofs, but instead by a misunderstanding of Bitcoin’s security and scaling model.<br><br>But is Bitcoin completely anonymous? Some crypto casinos and sports betting portals do allow their users to make deposits and receive payments with a minimum of personal information, or even without it. The most curious will probably want to figure out where the anonymity of BTC transactions ends. In this case, we can really say that they provide an opportunity to play for bitcoin anonymously.<br><br>Armed with this information, you can enjoy peace-of-mind about your bitcoin wallet… and you can also help to defeat some of the nefarious arguments coming from false assumptions. SPV wallets provide a high level of security, and most users do not need to run full nodes.
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | [https://crypto-currency.store/ avalon asic bitcoin mining machine] - [https://crypto-currency.store/ https://crypto-currency.store/]. À cela, il est souvent préféré d'utiliser une fédération de nœuds de la chaîne latérale parfois appelés « notaires » pour conserver les actifs. L'ancrage bilatéral pourrait être réalisé par l'intermédiaire un tiers unique qui garderait les actifs (une plateforme d'échange par exemple) mais il est évident que cela n'est pas très sécurisé. Ce contrat permet aussi de récupérer les fonds en cas de problème. Dans le cas de Liquid, c'est la même fédération qui assure le consensus et qui garde les bitcoins. Essentiellement, les bitcoins sont mis en séquestre dans un contrat autonome de multi-signature nécessitant les signatures d'un nombre fixe de membres de la fédération.<br><br>D'autres projets que Bitcoin prévoient d'utiliser les chaînes latérales, notamment les plateformes d'application décentralisées. On peut citer Ethereum avec le protocole Plasma , EOS ou encore Lisk qui utilise une chaîne latérale pour chacune de ses dApps.<br><br>Michael Saylor’s MicroStrategy (MSTR) is up 10%. Among crypto-related stocks on the move are miners Marathon Digital (MARA) up 20%, Hut 8 (HUT) +15%, and Riot Blockchain (RIOT) +15%. Crypto exchange Coinbase (COIN) is ahead 13%, and crypto merchant banker Galaxy Digital (GLXY.TO) is higher by 17%.<br><br>To allow for equitable access to all users, SEC reserves the right to limit requests originating from undeclared automated tools. Your request has been identified as part of a network of automated tools outside of the acceptable policy and will be managed until action is taken to declare your traffic.<br><br>For best practices on efficiently downloading information from SEC.gov, including the latest EDGAR filings, visit sec.gov/developer. You can also sign up for email updates on the SEC open data program, including best practices that make it more efficient to download data, and SEC.gov enhancements that may impact scripted downloading processes. For more information, contact opendata@sec.gov.<br><br>This SEC practice is designed to limit excessive automated searches on SEC.gov and is not intended or expected to impact individuals browsing the SEC.gov website. Once the rate of requests has dropped below the threshold for 10 minutes, the user may resume accessing content on SEC.gov. If a user or application submits more than 10 requests per second, further requests from the IP address(es) may be limited for a brief period.<br><br>I am unable to see how these two theorems mean the same thing. However, in between these two statements, a claim is made that they are equivalent. Any help clarifying why these two are equivalent would be greatly appreciated. And this is where I am having trouble.<br><br>It’s important to realize that an SPV wallet does not merely rely on the other network nodes to determine the longest chain of blocks. And of course, the kind of wallet you run has zero impact on the security of your private keys. Those who are inclined can examine the Electrum code to see this in action. It looks at the best header chain: the chain of valid block headers that has the most cumulative proof of work. A good SPV implementation also ensures that this proof of work is of the appropriate hashing difficulty level.<br><br>It would not take long for those non-compliant nodes to be forked off the network, but during that event, the SPV client could be temporarily fooled into thinking the non-upgraded nodes had the correct longest chain. (After a few more blocks, the longest valid chain would become apparent again.)<br><br>In simplistic terms: good [https://crypto-currency.store/ bitcoin] mining setup One side wants to follow the original Bitcoin idea of peer to peer cash and a plan to have bigger blocks; the other side wants to keep blocks small while transforming bitcoin into a settlement network.<br><br>99.99% of the time, this is not a problem because we can connect to many different nodes and make sure that everyone agrees on the same chain of blocks. Since an SPV wallet doesn’t check any of the other transactions in the block, theoretically the block could be invalid.<br><br>Contrary to popular belief, bitcoin mining servers Fraud Proof SPV and Full Nodes are not significantly more secure then SPV nodes…I am afraid that the current stagnation and abandonment of Bitcoin’s original scaling model is not induced by the absence of Fraud Proofs, but instead by a misunderstanding of Bitcoin’s security and scaling model.<br><br>But is Bitcoin completely anonymous? Some crypto casinos and sports betting portals do allow their users to make deposits and receive payments with a minimum of personal information, or even without it. The most curious will probably want to figure out where the anonymity of BTC transactions ends. In this case, we can really say that they provide an opportunity to play for bitcoin anonymously.<br><br>Armed with this information, you can enjoy peace-of-mind about your bitcoin wallet… and you can also help to defeat some of the nefarious arguments coming from false assumptions. SPV wallets provide a high level of security, and most users do not need to run full nodes.
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1666972839 |