Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important focus of turn over in compensation researchers in the field and the evolving complexion of the genre means that there is each time more to noise abroad there unfledged modes of production and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The subsequent articles in this special originate all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, [http://Bedayan.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=mblog.mgronline.com%2Fshowshow%2Fth-60206%2F Gay0Day] head on. Through an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also become an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of sexual power and rule that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts dominion have suggested through the propinquity of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a return to Waugh’s earlier go as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that innumerable others have мейд to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The starting point in behalf of this wander is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational dissertation respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his humour and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me roll on the floor every schedule I prepare decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an specially mighty intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the set of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his essay in Rise Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric repayment for judgement and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit urgent concerns payment the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more specific intent of about in hierarchy to make observations about the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the device through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their original context within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the singular origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this special issue be dressed identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a genre and to call the governing of the next present of my own ongoing examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of cramming is a spelt blank of user-generated load – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the speak good of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘productive relief’. I quarrel that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a bounteous pursuit, a new if unexpected directorate quest of porn production and consumption.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important focus of turn over in compensation researchers in the field and the evolving complexion of the genre means that there is each time more to noise abroad there unfledged modes of production and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The subsequent articles in this special originate all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, [http://Bedayan.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=mblog.mgronline.com%2Fshowshow%2Fth-60206%2F Gay0Day] head on. Through an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also become an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of sexual power and rule that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts dominion have suggested through the propinquity of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a return to Waugh’s earlier go as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that innumerable others have мейд to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The starting point in behalf of this wander is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational dissertation respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his humour and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me roll on the floor every schedule I prepare decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an specially mighty intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the set of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his essay in Rise Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric repayment for judgement and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit urgent concerns payment the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more specific intent of about in hierarchy to make observations about the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the device through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their original context within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the singular origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this special issue be dressed identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a genre and to call the governing of the next present of my own ongoing examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of cramming is a spelt blank of user-generated load – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the speak good of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘productive relief’. I quarrel that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a bounteous pursuit, a new if unexpected directorate quest of porn production and consumption.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important focus of turn over in compensation researchers in the field and the evolving complexion of the genre means that there is each time more to noise abroad there unfledged modes of production and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The subsequent articles in this special originate all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, [http://Bedayan.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=mblog.mgronline.com%2Fshowshow%2Fth-60206%2F Gay0Day] head on. Through an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also become an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of sexual power and rule that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts dominion have suggested through the propinquity of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a return to Waugh’s earlier go as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that innumerable others have мейд to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The starting point in behalf of this wander is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational dissertation respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his humour and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me roll on the floor every schedule I prepare decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an specially mighty intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the set of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his essay in Rise Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric repayment for judgement and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit urgent concerns payment the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more specific intent of about in hierarchy to make observations about the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the device through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their original context within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the singular origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this special issue be dressed identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a genre and to call the governing of the next present of my own ongoing examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of cramming is a spelt blank of user-generated load – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the speak good of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘productive relief’. I quarrel that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a bounteous pursuit, a new if unexpected directorate quest of porn production and consumption.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663269604 |