Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The purpose of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of headway pressing concerns in place of the porn manufacture; anyway, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific tangible of study in order to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the workings through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to call to mind that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a all the same more particular level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic career properly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Screen out Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to make a the actuality to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written very much astutely about the grinding of a distinguishing gay erudition and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that diverse others give birth to мейд back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene satisfied which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: [https://rw-Tweet.de/blogs/63557/61066/introduction-gay-porn-promptly gay0Day] Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn give birth to forever been objects of pernickety charm and include provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly salutary unique recompense the breakdown of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue entertain identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a variety and to manifest the governing of the next present of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of over is a specific type of user-generated load – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I quarrel that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a generative pursuit, a modish if unexpected administering for porn production and consumption.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>The purpose of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of headway pressing concerns in place of the porn manufacture; anyway, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific tangible of study in order to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the workings through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to call to mind that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a all the same more particular level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic career properly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Screen out Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to make a the actuality to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written very much astutely about the grinding of a distinguishing gay erudition and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that diverse others give birth to мейд back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene satisfied which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: [https://rw-Tweet.de/blogs/63557/61066/introduction-gay-porn-promptly gay0Day] Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn give birth to forever been objects of pernickety charm and include provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly salutary unique recompense the breakdown of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue entertain identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a variety and to manifest the governing of the next present of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of over is a specific type of user-generated load – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I quarrel that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a generative pursuit, a modish if unexpected administering for porn production and consumption.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The purpose of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of headway pressing concerns in place of the porn manufacture; anyway, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific tangible of study in order to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the workings through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to call to mind that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a all the same more particular level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic career properly began and a probing trajectory was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Screen out Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to make a the actuality to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written very much astutely about the grinding of a distinguishing gay erudition and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that diverse others give birth to мейд back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene satisfied which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: [https://rw-Tweet.de/blogs/63557/61066/introduction-gay-porn-promptly gay0Day] Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn give birth to forever been objects of pernickety charm and include provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly salutary unique recompense the breakdown of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue entertain identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a variety and to manifest the governing of the next present of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of over is a specific type of user-generated load – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the straightforward intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘bountiful relief’. I quarrel that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a generative pursuit, a modish if unexpected administering for porn production and consumption.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663118838 |