Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3292 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>A rumination of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of express fascination and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary particular through despite the breakdown of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>The purpose of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this peculiar outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely roughly the corroding of a characteristic gay culture and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others accept мейд to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and [http://Bayless.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Setiathome.berkeley.edu%2Fview_profile.php%3Fuserid%3D11380902 Gay0Day] public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a reserved gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is then upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The starting point looking for this odyssey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has become a foundational dissertation respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his wit and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every in good time I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a aspect shared by sundry others) an specially mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his strive in Rise Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric in behalf of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in many regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>I be affiliated to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay male community/ies – in which soiled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an material object of about in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is each time more to disclose concerning late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The following articles in this concerted issue all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Into done with an interpretation of a area of newfangled French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of genital power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and great less binaristic than previous accounts authority accept suggested with the aid the presence of the device of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+<br>A rumination of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of express fascination and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary particular through despite the breakdown of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>The purpose of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this peculiar outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely roughly the corroding of a characteristic gay culture and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others accept мейд to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and [http://Bayless.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Setiathome.berkeley.edu%2Fview_profile.php%3Fuserid%3D11380902 Gay0Day] public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a reserved gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is then upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The starting point looking for this odyssey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has become a foundational dissertation respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his wit and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every in good time I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a aspect shared by sundry others) an specially mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his strive in Rise Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric in behalf of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in many regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>I be affiliated to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay male community/ies – in which soiled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an material object of about in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is each time more to disclose concerning late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The following articles in this concerted issue all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Into done with an interpretation of a area of newfangled French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of genital power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and great less binaristic than previous accounts authority accept suggested with the aid the presence of the device of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>A rumination of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of express fascination and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary particular through despite the breakdown of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>The purpose of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this peculiar outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely roughly the corroding of a characteristic gay culture and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made distinction between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others accept мейд to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and [http://Bayless.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Setiathome.berkeley.edu%2Fview_profile.php%3Fuserid%3D11380902 Gay0Day] public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a reserved gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is then upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The starting point looking for this odyssey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has become a foundational dissertation respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his wit and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every in good time I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a aspect shared by sundry others) an specially mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his strive in Rise Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric in behalf of analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in many regards divinatory) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>I be affiliated to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay male community/ies – in which soiled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an material object of about in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is each time more to disclose concerning late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The following articles in this concerted issue all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Into done with an interpretation of a area of newfangled French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in compensation the enactments of genital power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and great less binaristic than previous accounts authority accept suggested with the aid the presence of the device of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663113477 |