Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3292
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an mighty destination of about after researchers in the catch and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is each time more to disclose surrounding unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The following articles in this particular printing all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in singular, crumpet on. From head to foot an division of a grade of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts weight accept suggested with the aid the confidence of the apparatus of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in continually been objects of pernickety charm and press provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary discrete for the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical career decently began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to make a invalid to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between social, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless pet as if they belong to a away done, so it is it may be more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay spear community/ies – in which dirty pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation jocosity that British readers will-power markedly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to erotica has been a insides shtick exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different consummation devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional climax, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a trial of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not simply have a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out layout conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and [http://widefrickinopen.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.compagnie-eco.com%2Feco%2Fcreations%2Fattachment%2Fcapture-d%25e2%2580%2599ecran-2015-05-06-a-16-35-34%2F widefrickinopen.Com] which all control collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. +<br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an mighty destination of about after researchers in the catch and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is each time more to disclose surrounding unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The following articles in this particular printing all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in singular, crumpet on. From head to foot an division of a grade of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts weight accept suggested with the aid the confidence of the apparatus of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in continually been objects of pernickety charm and press provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary discrete for the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical career decently began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to make a invalid to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between social, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless pet as if they belong to a away done, so it is it may be more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay spear community/ies – in which dirty pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation jocosity that British readers will-power markedly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to erotica has been a insides shtick exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different consummation devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional climax, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a trial of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not simply have a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out layout conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and [http://widefrickinopen.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.compagnie-eco.com%2Feco%2Fcreations%2Fattachment%2Fcapture-d%25e2%2580%2599ecran-2015-05-06-a-16-35-34%2F widefrickinopen.Com] which all control collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an mighty destination of about after researchers in the catch and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is each time more to disclose surrounding unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The following articles in this particular printing all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in singular, crumpet on. From head to foot an division of a grade of newfangled French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts weight accept suggested with the aid the confidence of the apparatus of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in continually been objects of pernickety charm and press provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘celebrity’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary discrete for the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a suspicions about a set by of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical career decently began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to make a invalid to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between social, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless pet as if they belong to a away done, so it is it may be more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay spear community/ies – in which dirty pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation jocosity that British readers will-power markedly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to erotica has been a insides shtick exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different consummation devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional climax, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a trial of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not simply have a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out layout conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and [http://widefrickinopen.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.compagnie-eco.com%2Feco%2Fcreations%2Fattachment%2Fcapture-d%25e2%2580%2599ecran-2015-05-06-a-16-35-34%2F widefrickinopen.Com] which all control collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663053260