Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty object of study looking for researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is eternally more to disclose about unfledged modes of production and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive consummation all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, chief honcho on. Auspices of an study of a grade of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can necessarily account for the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts might procure suggested via the spirit of the apparatus of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a all the same more particular constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic rush properly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to make a invalid to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to smut has been a insides apprehension for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific climax, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only tease a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the significant audience check out venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and [http://In-F.org/2022/09/12/introduction-gay-porn-right-away-2/ gay0Day] Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>I be affiliated to a cultural and factional context – the urban gay male community/ies – in which salacious pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The connection here between public, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless feel as if they associated to a distant past, so it is perhaps more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Level’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted significance are of course tenacious concerns for the porn industry; despite that, Tsika identifies a rather more well-defined intent of study in regularity to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the workings through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original frame of reference within sunken and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the civic and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+<br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty object of study looking for researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is eternally more to disclose about unfledged modes of production and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive consummation all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, chief honcho on. Auspices of an study of a grade of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can necessarily account for the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts might procure suggested via the spirit of the apparatus of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a all the same more particular constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic rush properly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to make a invalid to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to smut has been a insides apprehension for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific climax, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only tease a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the significant audience check out venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and [http://In-F.org/2022/09/12/introduction-gay-porn-right-away-2/ gay0Day] Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>I be affiliated to a cultural and factional context – the urban gay male community/ies – in which salacious pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The connection here between public, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless feel as if they associated to a distant past, so it is perhaps more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Level’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted significance are of course tenacious concerns for the porn industry; despite that, Tsika identifies a rather more well-defined intent of study in regularity to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the workings through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original frame of reference within sunken and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the civic and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty object of study looking for researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is eternally more to disclose about unfledged modes of production and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive consummation all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, chief honcho on. Auspices of an study of a grade of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can necessarily account for the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts might procure suggested via the spirit of the apparatus of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a all the same more particular constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic rush properly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to make a invalid to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to smut has been a insides apprehension for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific climax, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only tease a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manful porn viewers and the significant audience check out venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and [http://In-F.org/2022/09/12/introduction-gay-porn-right-away-2/ gay0Day] Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>I be affiliated to a cultural and factional context – the urban gay male community/ies – in which salacious pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The connection here between public, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless feel as if they associated to a distant past, so it is perhaps more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Level’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted significance are of course tenacious concerns for the porn industry; despite that, Tsika identifies a rather more well-defined intent of study in regularity to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the workings through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original frame of reference within sunken and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the civic and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663014147 |