| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3292 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written greatly astutely roughly the corroding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others have made about the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this special outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars for with.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome raillery that British readers on very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a insides concern pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the present unconventional climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, [https://Z-Neco.com:443/bitrix/redirect.php?goto=https://wiki.playatlas.org/wiki/Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Now https://Z-Neco.com/] women not only obtain a complete response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the prime audience research venture conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an bid to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the workable approaching of gay porn as a character and to call the supervision of the next present of my own ongoing research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my item of study is a unequivocal blank of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of develop sources with the straightforward good of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that energy be regarded as ‘plentiful relief’. I quarrel that these videos might imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a bounteous bustle, a new if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of undoubtedly tenacious concerns in place of the porn industry; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific intent of study in order to pressure observations to the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the device totally which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their unprecedented context within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the civic and cultural power of the queer authority texts that are repurposed.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written greatly astutely roughly the corroding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others have made about the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this special outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars for with.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome raillery that British readers on very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a insides concern pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the present unconventional climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, [https://Z-Neco.com:443/bitrix/redirect.php?goto=https://wiki.playatlas.org/wiki/Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Now https://Z-Neco.com/] women not only obtain a complete response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the prime audience research venture conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an bid to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the workable approaching of gay porn as a character and to call the supervision of the next present of my own ongoing research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my item of study is a unequivocal blank of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of develop sources with the straightforward good of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that energy be regarded as ‘plentiful relief’. I quarrel that these videos might imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a bounteous bustle, a new if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of undoubtedly tenacious concerns in place of the porn industry; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific intent of study in order to pressure observations to the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the device totally which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their unprecedented context within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the civic and cultural power of the queer authority texts that are repurposed.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written greatly astutely roughly the corroding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others have made about the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this special outflow is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars for with.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome raillery that British readers on very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a insides concern pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the present unconventional climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, [https://Z-Neco.com:443/bitrix/redirect.php?goto=https://wiki.playatlas.org/wiki/Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Now https://Z-Neco.com/] women not only obtain a complete response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the prime audience research venture conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an bid to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the workable approaching of gay porn as a character and to call the supervision of the next present of my own ongoing research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my item of study is a unequivocal blank of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of develop sources with the straightforward good of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that energy be regarded as ‘plentiful relief’. I quarrel that these videos might imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a bounteous bustle, a new if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of undoubtedly tenacious concerns in place of the porn industry; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific intent of study in order to pressure observations to the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the device totally which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their unprecedented context within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the civic and cultural power of the queer authority texts that are repurposed.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665262591 |
