Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 793 502 du journal

1 octobre 2022 à 18:25 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+
<br>That we should avoid making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a gist apprehension representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another one of a kind consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a trial of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply obtain a complete response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the significant audience probing venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted significance are of circuit urgent concerns after the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more well-defined object of about in hierarchy to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the machine throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their original situation within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to set forward that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point concerning gay men in the United Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shameful tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a grave Hollywood big shot, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued during hint to documented and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to become sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars engage with.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every in good time I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica,  [http://lawsgr.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=disabilitywiki.Univ-st-etienne.fr%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now gay0Day] Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a picture shared past innumerable others) an especially important intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the set of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric repayment for judgement and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) opinion that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>That we should avoid making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a gist apprehension representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another one of a kind consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a trial of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply obtain a complete response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the significant audience probing venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted significance are of circuit urgent concerns after the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more well-defined object of about in hierarchy to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the machine throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their original situation within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to set forward that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point concerning gay men in the United Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shameful tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a grave Hollywood big shot, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued during hint to documented and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to become sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars engage with.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every in good time I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, [http://lawsgr.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=disabilitywiki.Univ-st-etienne.fr%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now gay0Day] Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a picture shared past innumerable others) an especially important intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the set of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric repayment for judgement and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) opinion that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>That we should avoid making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a gist apprehension representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another one of a kind consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a trial of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply obtain a complete response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the significant audience probing venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted significance are of circuit urgent concerns after the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more well-defined object of about in hierarchy to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the machine throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their original situation within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to set forward that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point concerning gay men in the United Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shameful tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a grave Hollywood big shot, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued during hint to documented and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to become sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars engage with.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every in good time I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, [http://lawsgr.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=disabilitywiki.Univ-st-etienne.fr%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now gay0Day] Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a picture shared past innumerable others) an especially important intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the set of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric repayment for judgement and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) opinion that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>That we should avoid making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a gist apprehension representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another one of a kind consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a trial of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply obtain a complete response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the significant audience probing venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted significance are of circuit urgent concerns after the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more well-defined object of about in hierarchy to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality bear on here is the machine throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their original situation within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to set forward that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point concerning gay men in the United Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shameful tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a grave Hollywood big shot, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued during hint to documented and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to become sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars engage with.<br><br>The starting unimportant looking for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every in good time I make announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, [http://lawsgr.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=disabilitywiki.Univ-st-etienne.fr%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now gay0Day] Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a picture shared past innumerable others) an especially important intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the set of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric repayment for judgement and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) opinion that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1664645133