| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to erotica has been a gist interest to for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not simply have a complete answer to gay porn and [https://m.sibspress.org/url.php?url=aHR0cDovL21hcm1hcmlzLkp1c3RnZWFyLm5ldC9hdXRob3IvZmFlcnVwZXJ0NDkv Https://M.sibspress.org/] the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired nigh the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic craft fittingly began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Screen out Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to get a the actuality to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to discuss gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illuminate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of undoubtedly tenacious concerns payment the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous intent of studio in hierarchy to make observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the device through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their unprecedented frame of reference within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the civic and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting juncture for this route is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has become a foundational try respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is superior (his history of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every schedule I prepare decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his essay was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared during innumerable others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the publication of his tract in Ignore Settled in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematic rubric for analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to erotica has been a gist interest to for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not simply have a complete answer to gay porn and [https://m.sibspress.org/url.php?url=aHR0cDovL21hcm1hcmlzLkp1c3RnZWFyLm5ldC9hdXRob3IvZmFlcnVwZXJ0NDkv Https://M.sibspress.org/] the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired nigh the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic craft fittingly began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Screen out Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to get a the actuality to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to discuss gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illuminate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of undoubtedly tenacious concerns payment the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous intent of studio in hierarchy to make observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the device through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their unprecedented frame of reference within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the civic and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting juncture for this route is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has become a foundational try respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is superior (his history of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every schedule I prepare decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his essay was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared during innumerable others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the publication of his tract in Ignore Settled in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematic rubric for analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to erotica has been a gist interest to for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not simply have a complete answer to gay porn and [https://m.sibspress.org/url.php?url=aHR0cDovL21hcm1hcmlzLkp1c3RnZWFyLm5ldC9hdXRob3IvZmFlcnVwZXJ0NDkv Https://M.sibspress.org/] the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired nigh the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic craft fittingly began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Screen out Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to get a the actuality to save its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to discuss gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illuminate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of undoubtedly tenacious concerns payment the porn labour; in any case, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous intent of studio in hierarchy to make observations upon the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood concern here is the device through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their unprecedented frame of reference within radical and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the civic and cultural power of the atypical authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting juncture for this route is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has become a foundational try respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is superior (his history of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every schedule I prepare decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his essay was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared during innumerable others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the set of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the publication of his tract in Ignore Settled in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematic rubric for analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663895989 |
