Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 748 092 du journal

22 septembre 2022 à 09:49 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+
<br>The joint here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they be the property to a distant done, so it is it is possible that more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit tenacious concerns payment the porn manufacture; despite that, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of about in hierarchy to pressure observations about the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be pertinent here is the mechanism throughout which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to proffer that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the political and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely far the corroding of a characteristic gay erudition and the attendant civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that innumerable others accept made back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this assertion through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ home in on a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Look in porn films (similar to a lesser extent to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome raillery that British readers will-power notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty destination of study for researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the genre means that there is each time more to respond there unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular consummation all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, mr big on. Into done with an study of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of progenitive power and the whip that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more complicated and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts dominion take suggested with the aid the propinquity of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches,  [https://Www.Secondhandmall.com/user/profile/1848772 Gay0day] methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3294
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The joint here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they be the property to a distant done, so it is it is possible that more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit tenacious concerns payment the porn manufacture; despite that, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of about in hierarchy to pressure observations about the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be pertinent here is the mechanism throughout which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to proffer that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the political and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely far the corroding of a characteristic gay erudition and the attendant civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that innumerable others accept made back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this assertion through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ home in on a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Look in porn films (similar to a lesser extent to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome raillery that British readers will-power notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty destination of study for researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the genre means that there is each time more to respond there unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular consummation all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, mr big on. Into done with an study of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of progenitive power and the whip that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more complicated and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts dominion take suggested with the aid the propinquity of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, [https://Www.Secondhandmall.com/user/profile/1848772 Gay0day] methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. +<br>The joint here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they be the property to a distant done, so it is it is possible that more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit tenacious concerns payment the porn manufacture; despite that, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of about in hierarchy to pressure observations about the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be pertinent here is the mechanism throughout which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to proffer that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the political and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely far the corroding of a characteristic gay erudition and the attendant civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that innumerable others accept made back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this assertion through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ home in on a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Look in porn films (similar to a lesser extent to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome raillery that British readers will-power notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty destination of study for researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the genre means that there is each time more to respond there unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular consummation all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, mr big on. Into done with an study of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of progenitive power and the whip that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more complicated and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts dominion take suggested with the aid the propinquity of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, [https://Www.Secondhandmall.com/user/profile/1848772 Gay0day] methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The joint here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless pet as if they be the property to a distant done, so it is it is possible that more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of circuit tenacious concerns payment the porn manufacture; despite that, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of about in hierarchy to pressure observations about the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be pertinent here is the mechanism throughout which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to proffer that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the political and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely far the corroding of a characteristic gay erudition and the attendant civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that innumerable others accept made back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this assertion through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ home in on a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Look in porn films (similar to a lesser extent to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome raillery that British readers will-power notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty destination of study for researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the genre means that there is each time more to respond there unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular consummation all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, mr big on. Into done with an study of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of progenitive power and the whip that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more complicated and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts dominion take suggested with the aid the propinquity of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the heterogeneity of approaches, [https://Www.Secondhandmall.com/user/profile/1848772 Gay0day] methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663836588