Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 716 162 du journal

13 septembre 2022 à 09:44 : Margareta03W (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+
The starting unimportant looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every in good time I have read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared by many others) an especially worthy intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lay down of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his essay in Jump Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematic rubric for analysis and the especially apposite (and in multifarious regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of headway forceful concerns after the porn effort; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual object of about in regularity to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the mechanism through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the political and cultural power of the atypical origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an conspicuous goal of turn over in compensation researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is always more to noise abroad surrounding new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive printing all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, chief honcho on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of erotic power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts weight accept suggested through the propinquity of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn experimentation, and  https://lawyer.zaxisit.com/Index.php?action=profile&u=26089 Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ sort out a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers resolution markedly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The connection here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they be a part of to a distant gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The intention of this special consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars for with.

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
Margareta03W
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3294
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
The starting unimportant looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every in good time I have read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared by many others) an especially worthy intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lay down of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his essay in Jump Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematic rubric for analysis and the especially apposite (and in multifarious regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of headway forceful concerns after the porn effort; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual object of about in regularity to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the mechanism through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the political and cultural power of the atypical origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an conspicuous goal of turn over in compensation researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is always more to noise abroad surrounding new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive printing all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, chief honcho on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of erotic power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts weight accept suggested through the propinquity of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn experimentation, and https://lawyer.zaxisit.com/Index.php?action=profile&u=26089 Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ sort out a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers resolution markedly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The connection here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they be a part of to a distant gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The intention of this special consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars for with.
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. +The starting unimportant looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every in good time I have read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared by many others) an especially worthy intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lay down of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his essay in Jump Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematic rubric for analysis and the especially apposite (and in multifarious regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of headway forceful concerns after the porn effort; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual object of about in regularity to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the mechanism through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the political and cultural power of the atypical origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an conspicuous goal of turn over in compensation researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is always more to noise abroad surrounding new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive printing all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, chief honcho on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of erotic power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts weight accept suggested through the propinquity of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn experimentation, and https://lawyer.zaxisit.com/Index.php?action=profile&u=26089 Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ sort out a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers resolution markedly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The connection here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they be a part of to a distant gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The intention of this special consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars for with.
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
The starting unimportant looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational try for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every in good time I have read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared by many others) an especially worthy intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lay down of communal and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his essay in Jump Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematic rubric for analysis and the especially apposite (and in multifarious regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of headway forceful concerns after the porn effort; in any case, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual object of about in regularity to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the mechanism through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within resistance and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the political and cultural power of the atypical origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an conspicuous goal of turn over in compensation researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is always more to noise abroad surrounding new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive printing all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, chief honcho on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account for the enactments of erotic power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts weight accept suggested through the propinquity of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn experimentation, and https://lawyer.zaxisit.com/Index.php?action=profile&u=26089 Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ sort out a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers resolution markedly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The connection here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they be a part of to a distant gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The intention of this special consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars for with.
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663058647