Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Trustees and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic career properly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to get a situation recompense its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The objective of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the sense of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point concerning gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this station a primary Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first published in 1967, a laws that argued by reference to historical and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to become one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of course tenacious concerns for the porn manufacture; in any case, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous tangible of study in order to enact observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification concern here is the workings throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within underground and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The joint here between social, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a reserved done, so it is it may be more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is now over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational [http://Raderlaw.info/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=mediawiki.yunheng.oucreate.com%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Promptly try Raderlaw] ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences respond to smut has been a gist shtick representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely have a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manful porn viewers and the prime audience probing project conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Trustees and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic career properly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to get a situation recompense its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The objective of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the sense of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point concerning gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this station a primary Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first published in 1967, a laws that argued by reference to historical and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to become one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of course tenacious concerns for the porn manufacture; in any case, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous tangible of study in order to enact observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification concern here is the workings throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within underground and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The joint here between social, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a reserved done, so it is it may be more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is now over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational [http://Raderlaw.info/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=mediawiki.yunheng.oucreate.com%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Promptly try Raderlaw] ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences respond to smut has been a gist shtick representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely have a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manful porn viewers and the prime audience probing project conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Trustees and inspired by the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic career properly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Screen out Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to get a situation recompense its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The objective of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the sense of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point concerning gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this station a primary Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first published in 1967, a laws that argued by reference to historical and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to become one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of course tenacious concerns for the porn manufacture; in any case, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous tangible of study in order to enact observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification concern here is the workings throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within underground and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The joint here between social, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a reserved done, so it is it may be more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is now over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational [http://Raderlaw.info/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=mediawiki.yunheng.oucreate.com%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Promptly try Raderlaw] ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences respond to smut has been a gist shtick representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely have a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manful porn viewers and the prime audience probing project conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1665448230