@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ - +The aim was to determine the safety and effectiveness Tui Na as treatment for spasticity in muscles of stroke victims. Study design: A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the effect of Tui Na on spasticity in the muscles in patients with stroke. Two groups were randomly chosen from a sample of 14 stroke survivors who had normal neurological function. They received either Tui Na (nontraditional therapy) or standard medical treatment combined with physiotherapy for four months after their stroke. The researchers performed a rating of muscular and physical weakness at the end of the four month period.<br><br>There was a significant effect of Tui Na on the mean improvement in mean disability score (MDS) however, there was no effect on improvement in the mean muscle function or muscle function at the conclusion of the follow-up. Conventional treatments included regular corticosteroids, nitroglycerin injections, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, radiofrequency ablations laser beam therapy and local anesthetics. Improvement was observed in six (range of improvements from slight to profound) of seven patients who received Tui Na and in eight of nine patients who received only conventional treatments. These results indicate the value of Tui Na in the recovery of stroke patients but no definitive conclusions can be made regarding the impact on cognition, emotional well-being, or sleep quality. These areas will be explored in greater detail by future research studies.<br><br>Safety and Effectiveness: There were no adverse effects in the acute phase of either group. One of the post stroke trials gave patients oral drugs to treat cervical radiculopathy. Patients in both groups did not experience any adverse effects from the drugs. In one trial patients who received the dose of loperamide showed no relief from pain or reduction in fever or cough. The researchers believe that this drug could be effective in the short-term management of acute neck pain for [https://writeablog.net/daylier01/massage-and-wellness 탱크출장안마] smoker<br><br>r>Study by Chun et al. found that patients who received acupuncture showed significant improvement in the mean of the perception of pain and the ability to perform standard physical activities. The researchers emphasized the need for massive numbers of controlled, randomised trials in order to establish the value of acupuncture in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. They concluded that more research must be conducted to confirm these findings and to determine whether acupuncture is beneficial in treating cervical radiculopathy. However, the data available do not support the use of acupuncture for the management of spinal cord injurie<br><br>r>Chung et. Chung et. conducted a meta-analysis. found a decrease in the mean nerve damage in patients who underwent Tui Na therapy. Although the effect was not statistically significant (odds –0.40), [http://hawkee.com/ 양산출장마사지] it was statistically significant (confidence interval: -0.15 to 0.2). This study is significant because the number of studies conducted in this area is small; furthermore, it is unclear if the improvement seen in patients was due to acupuncture, or by the effects of the treatment on nerves. However, Tui Na therapy appears to be an appropriate alternative to conservative treatments in patients who suffer from chronic neck pain, as evidenced by the increase in pain scores in the treated g<br><br>><br>Albers and his colleagues carried out a systematic review that showed that tui-na therapy has positive effects on patients with cervical radiolucopathy. However the majority of these studies came taken from the USA and Canada with the majority of patients were from different cities and the quality of the research was not high. The pooled effect was very small (pooled effect size -0.15). These studies prove the efficacy of Chinese medicine in managing chronic pain and disabi<br><br>><br>There are a variety of reasons why some studies are better than others. This includes the choice of study design, reporting bias, and other bias factors, as well as the characteristics of the treatment arm (whether it was placebo or active). The use of various assessment tools can also lead to variability. The main issue with using questionnaires in controlled trials that are randomised is that they lack reproducibility and don't permit researchers to evaluate possible outcomes with accuracy. Another reason for variability is the number of people treated, since some people are treated better than others, both within the arms and between <br><br>><br>To conclude we believe that, although there are some interesting differences between Chinese soft tissue acupuncture and tui na massage however, the evidence is thin to make a compelling argument in either direction. It is clear that both interventions can have positive effects, particularly when used together. We recommend that anyone suffering from neck pain or disability should seek advice from their physician. We also recommend following any advice above carefully, and don't stop treating your condition when the symptoms appear to be fading. This will ensure that you get the best possible treatment without further injury or aggravating your condition. If you are seeking more information about how to treat stiff necks and other soft tissue problems you might want to visit our website.