Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>At a still more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Cabinet and inspired nigh the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my scholastic rush properly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to urge a situation for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The starting unimportant for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the biography, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational dissertation because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As many times, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor [http://semillita.info/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Shokoootake.com%2Farchives%2F2225 gay0Day] every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared by sundry others) an specially worthy intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lay down of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric in behalf of judgement and the notably apposite (and in many regards vatic) criticism that gay porn does not be present in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely roughly the grinding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the cohort federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others compel ought to made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the unlikeness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (similar to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular documentation jocosity that British readers resolution markedly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have always been objects of fine point magic and possess provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly useful individual recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a void of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>At a still more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Cabinet and inspired nigh the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my scholastic rush properly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to urge a situation for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The starting unimportant for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the biography, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational dissertation because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As many times, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor [http://semillita.info/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Shokoootake.com%2Farchives%2F2225 gay0Day] every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared by sundry others) an specially worthy intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lay down of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric in behalf of judgement and the notably apposite (and in many regards vatic) criticism that gay porn does not be present in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely roughly the grinding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the cohort federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others compel ought to made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the unlikeness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (similar to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular documentation jocosity that British readers resolution markedly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have always been objects of fine point magic and possess provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly useful individual recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a void of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>At a still more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Cabinet and inspired nigh the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my scholastic rush properly began and a investigate trajectory was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to urge a situation for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The starting unimportant for this journey is naturally a revisiting of the biography, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational dissertation because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As many times, his cleverness and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor [http://semillita.info/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Shokoootake.com%2Farchives%2F2225 gay0Day] every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared by sundry others) an specially worthy intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lay down of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric in behalf of judgement and the notably apposite (and in many regards vatic) criticism that gay porn does not be present in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely roughly the grinding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the cohort federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others compel ought to made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the unlikeness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars engage with.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (similar to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular documentation jocosity that British readers resolution markedly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have always been objects of fine point magic and possess provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly useful individual recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a void of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663846924