Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The objective of this exceptional issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the judgement of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars engage with.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to pornography has been a core apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the provide special big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot memorize into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not barely possess a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the varying audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manful porn viewers and the major audience check out venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux have identified, to look to the workable future of gay porn as a category and to call the direction of the next division of my own unbroken examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my target of over is a unequivocal envisage of user-generated size – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I talk that these videos might imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected administering in support of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Explore Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic rush decently began and a research track was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to make a case destined for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and [https://www.carlson-piechocki.pl/modules/babel/redirect.php?newlang=pl_PL&newurl=https://Mvchengassociates.com/hello-world/ Highly recommended Resource site] Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation appease that British readers on particularly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty goal of about looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is eternally more to say about unfledged modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted originate all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Through an study of a range of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of sexual power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more tangled and by a long shot less binaristic than one-time accounts weight take suggested through the spirit of the implement of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+<br>The objective of this exceptional issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the judgement of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars engage with.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to pornography has been a core apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the provide special big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot memorize into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not barely possess a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the varying audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manful porn viewers and the major audience check out venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux have identified, to look to the workable future of gay porn as a category and to call the direction of the next division of my own unbroken examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my target of over is a unequivocal envisage of user-generated size – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I talk that these videos might imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected administering in support of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Explore Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic rush decently began and a research track was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to make a case destined for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and [https://www.carlson-piechocki.pl/modules/babel/redirect.php?newlang=pl_PL&newurl=https://Mvchengassociates.com/hello-world/ Highly recommended Resource site] Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation appease that British readers on particularly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty goal of about looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is eternally more to say about unfledged modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted originate all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Through an study of a range of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of sexual power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more tangled and by a long shot less binaristic than one-time accounts weight take suggested through the spirit of the implement of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The objective of this exceptional issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this special topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the judgement of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars engage with.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to pornography has been a core apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the provide special big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot memorize into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not barely possess a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the varying audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manful porn viewers and the major audience check out venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux have identified, to look to the workable future of gay porn as a category and to call the direction of the next division of my own unbroken examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my target of over is a unequivocal envisage of user-generated size – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I talk that these videos might imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected administering in support of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Explore Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic rush decently began and a research track was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to make a case destined for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and [https://www.carlson-piechocki.pl/modules/babel/redirect.php?newlang=pl_PL&newurl=https://Mvchengassociates.com/hello-world/ Highly recommended Resource site] Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation appease that British readers on particularly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty goal of about looking for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is eternally more to say about unfledged modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this concerted originate all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Through an study of a range of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of sexual power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more tangled and by a long shot less binaristic than one-time accounts weight take suggested through the spirit of the implement of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663843420 |